Battlefield V

Battlefield V Dev Tracker




28 Jun

Comment

Originally posted by Raptor745

Just to clarify on the title, I know UK and Germany are Allies and Axis; I'm not stupid. What I meant in the title is that DICE view it as generic Allies and Axis or "red vs. blue" to quote them, despite overwhelming evidence in game that the Allies and Axis are subdivided into countries

I'd volunteer that the posts title is a little more distorted than that.

It's not 'DICE views it as', what has been cited there is my personal experience of how I approach the game when I sit and play it as a player, and I was happy to volunteer my perspective on that for the purpose of getting more out of the conversation with people that share a different perspective. I'm careful to highlight when I'm choosing to represent my personal perspective in the hope that this confusion doesn't occur.

... Read more
Comment

Originally posted by dacherrybomb

I apologize for my misunderstanding. Thanks anyway.

No worries.

Comment

Originally posted by OpusZombie

Braddock512 Are you aware of the problem on XB1 where the game freezes on loading into a match (during the loading screens where it shows assignments … tips …). Happened 4 times to me this morning from the server browser on 4 different Conquest servers (and different maps). Finally got in a game by joining via the Tides of War weekly page. Others are reporting the same.

We’re tracking performance and stability issues on Xbox One.

Comment

Originally posted by dacherrybomb

Again thank you Braddock. Your a hard working moderator on Reddit. Many thanks!

I’m not a Reddit mod. I’m one of the Community managers for the game.

Comment

We’ve shared this with the internal teams. Thanks for the detailed and well-thought out post.

Comment

Originally posted by dacherrybomb

u/braddock512

Can I get your comment on this? I’m remaining optimistic that this was an honest mistake or this could have been done on accident.

I checked with the team - most are off right now (it’s late in Stockholm), but I’ll come back tomorrow and let you know what they said.

I do know there was some AA adjustments in the last couple of updates, but I don’t think one came in this update.


27 Jun

Comment

Originally posted by SethJew

Okay, what about country specific voice lines and vehicles? This stretches beyond cosmetics. New factions would mean the U.S can use their appropriately used vehicles, like the Sherman Tank instead of the Valentine tank

I guess they could do that but look at BF1, you could use Russian Bombers on maps that had nothing to do with the Russian Army/Air Force.

Comment

Originally posted by keytop19

Is Al Sundan going to be released on breakthrough at all? The only talk about the map has been for conquest.

Yes, in a future update.

Comment

Originally posted by SFooter

Where the f**k is the map for Xbox eu?

It’s live on a platforms. It’s part of the TDM and Squad Conquest rotation or you can use the server browser to find that specific map.

Comment

Originally posted by byfo1991

u/Braddock512 Yeah it was already released and then REMOVED. And it was promised to return but it never did since January. Any news on that?

I can check with the Armory team to see when it may come back.

Comment

Originally posted by DeltaActual

it's not being awarded after completing all the assignments... did you posted it by accident?

The reward for this week is the gun, not the soldier customization.

Comment

Originally posted by stickler_Meseeks

Wanted to confirm with you that someone has reported the skin most likely causing the invisibility on soldiers? If not I can provide via PM (not something I personally want to spread further and I've already unequipped it from any soldier that had it).

Pm me.

Comment

Originally posted by PUDDY300

This comment right here seems to be the embodiment of communication issues between DICE and the community. These are the exact same non-answers we got previously and now the community is upset because we got confirmation that the Americans and British I'm Europe will not be separated. The question had been asked plenty of times before, but no Dev wanted to jump in and give an answer that actually confirmed or denied if there would be a split, or if there would be any British cosmetics coming. In fact, the only reason people know now (before you confirmed with the "red v blue" comment) was because temporyal had made a post about these particular cosmetics being labeled in files as American. The bottom line is, none of this information came from you guys. So yeah I think you should tell us what the current idea is with the Americans and Japanese in the Pacific. So far data mining suggests you guys will be trying to split it. That's fine and all, but this stuff shouldn't come from dat...

Read more

I can only volunteer that my previous response is exactly what you’ve said it is, it’s a non-answer. I have not answered your question. I have only acknowledged it and looked to volunteer why I am not answering it.

If I were to provide a response similar to the one you suggested, I would be answering the question and worse still I’d be doing something more dangerous in making inferences that we may go the direction you want. To do so (in any circumstance, not specific to this topic) can lead to disappointment for folks who take away different things from that type of answer.

We aren’t talking about Pacific beyond what we said at EA Play, and it’s not right for me to make agreements that may contradict or reinforce present design routes until we get to a point where we lock in and move to polish. Stuff can change, and I’d sooner be able to communicate from a matter of fact vs conjecture and speculation.

That others in the community will choose to speculate...

Read more
Comment

I think you're going to be disappointed. I believe that all this means are new country specific costume sets and weapons.

Comment

Your post/comment has been removed:

Your post has been removed. Please use our weekly Friend Request Weekend threads for all friend request, looking for group, or looking for server posts. Keep an eye out this Friday for the next one. In addition, you can check out these subreddits r/battlefieldlfg and r/bf1platoons, as well as the Battlefield Discord channel.

If you feel this was a mistake, please contact the moderators by clicking ...

Read more
Comment

Your post/comment has been removed:

Keep it civil.

  • Posts must be directly related to Battlefield V.

  • Do not personally attack other users, and do not "name and shame" specific users or servers without sufficient evidence backing up your claim. This includes refraining from posting personal information of others. Reddit isn't your personal army.

  • Do not post inappropriate language, including but not limited to sex, race, and religion.

  • Memes, reaction gifs and low-quality/low-attempt content not allowed.

If you feel this was a mistake, please contact the moderators by clicking here.

Comment

Originally posted by South3rs

I understand that. We all have different opinions. Sorry if I came across like an idiot, I respect you guys and other people’s opinions. Thanks 🙏

You didn’t. Passion just looks like that sometimes.

Comment

Originally posted by South3rs

Sorry but (and I know it’s your own opinion) I disagree with the comment “Red vs Blue”. I understand this from a gaming point of view that priority number 1 is to focus on gameplay, fun, inclusivity, etc. But can I ask this...

What is the point in picking WW2 as an overall theme in the first place? Why was BF1 focused on WW1? Why are we so hyped about the “Pacific”? Because it sets the tone, the story, the feel for the game. For some players, like me, that stuff is really important. I bought the game because I wanted to experience the WW2 theme. Same reason I buy any other game and don’t just generically go and play Fortnite or CoD religiously. It’s the experience...

Also, from a business point of view are you not shooting yourselves in the foot by doing this? Surely more factions, more customisation and variety, will lead to more in game sales for you guys...? Isn’t it better to have as many factions as possible to maximise the potential for more sales? For exampl...

Read more

There’s no answers here I can provide you with but I’m keen to see others on the thread jump in and share there perspectives as players. Whilst there’s a difference in expectation between us, I’m still keen to get others thoughts on it to share.

Comment

Originally posted by Kingtolapsium

Feels unbalanced. One would assume we would have a heavy focus on British soldiers and engagements with the earlier conflicts, then transition to later armies, as was lined out in the Tides of War being a walk through different parts of the war. I haven't learned anything in the way I learned with BF1, and as is BFV could be entirely detached from actual conflicts and would seem no different to me. WW2 was about a hell of a lot more than "red vs blue", and if that is the "respect" the team is giving this conflict, then they should've simply gone alt-history.

 

Instead of getting concise content around the beginning, it feels like things are just being thrown in when they are completed, in a giant panicky rush. The maps so far really just feel like conversions of assets already used in the campaign, really not very exciting. The journey so far... really hasn't taken us anywhere. That is disappointing.

 

The content drops do not feel properly consecuti...

Read more

Gameplay stability and performance is the most important thing for us to address, and is being worked on. No argument from me, and I appreciate you sharing your perspective on the rest.