@SteLavery It's on the list of things for the team to consider. That list is long, though, and some of the things on it have had rather more widespread interest than this one. Might well happen, though you'll understand if it doesn't.
@rot_76 I might be the member of the team who reads that site least, actually :P
I certainly don't think it represents the whole community, though (and this platform doesn't either).
@Barkingdogs9 That'd be the plan for a soft launch, yeah. We did something similar with Clans, last year, though that was more restricted for how many players could engage with it. This probably wouldn't be.
@BakingsodahOSRS Sounds like you've sent an appeal to the Support team, and you'd need to hope they grant it when they get to it - I'm afraid that's not something I could offer to do instead of them.
@OG_Zayzor You were hoping for "Despite what other players have said about it not being much benefit to PvPers to have the item unique to the Wilderness, I declare that in response to your tweet I will force the team to cancel the idea because of how you'd feel" ?
Nah, not promising that.
@kyle41539052 If you've convinced yourself to believe that, you'll have to conclude that my reply would be lying to you as part of an evil conspiracy to have fewer customers just out of spite :P
Meanwhile, this isn't a Support channel and I'm able to help you with your account instead of them.
@Kittrell69420 This isn't a Support channel and I'm afraid I don't have any info about whatever account it is you're asking about, but if you think someone else might have racked up that bill in your absence, see here for asking Support to cancel it: https://support.runescape.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360000940597
@maxwellreuter Its devs would be very glad to try for some form of queuing system, I believe, if time permits. Though in the meantime you may need to try other worlds if the recommended ones are full.
@MandusRS Easy enough to change, though those are technically more useful for other things, and could potentially be wanted. A toggle would avoid issues with that, though.
@GodofsilverRS I don't remember seeing a teleport there, for UIM or otherwise, though I've mostly only seen the inside of it so far rather than peripheral features. Sorry - it does sound worth checking how your mode will use the area, when the dev's around to ask.
@OSNoobScape If something's wrong with the commander there, right-click the 'Report' button in the game and you'll find a bug report form for letting the testers know directly. It may be considered low priority, though.
The dragons are likely going through ranged code, which allows diagonals.
@Bagelbau5 I'd understood it already had been, but the player recovered it after that. Would have been good if the KC could have been rolled back as part of that, though.
@OSNoobScape Like the warrior ring, you mean? Accuracy is already about helping you overcome your target's defence, whether that comes from bonuses or otherwise - it sounds a bit like just giving it more accuracy.
@Alex_b683 Well, yeah, it's anyone's guess what projects he'd end up with if there were a vacancy, if he applied, and if he received it... After all, while his quests are probably his most famous work, he did a lot of other content too, as you've noted. Keep your fingers crossed, though :)
@gobblinfker Thanks! For anything else you discover, right-click the 'Report' button in the game and you'll find a bug report form for letting the testers know directly :)
@Andrew24786017 I'd be glad for that to get a buff, and had hoped to include something for that via the Wilderness Boss rework project. I'm sorry it wasn't part of something last November, though.
@OsrsVaxx I was never all that clear that it'd return at all, as there was no plan for that at the time it was removed. Though quite a few of us in the team are keen to get to try another version of it, if we can avoid the issues from before.
@shox_osrs Thanks for the recommendation. The idea of limiting how many people could be engaged in a fight is quite appealing, though in practice I think we'd struggle to implement it, especially if it comes with damage effects too :(
@haekal_arkan Cheers :) I'd not be able to promise the update you're suggesting, by the way, but I wouldn't rule it out forever. One can perhaps get more of those runes via the skill than one could in previous years, though.
@Jordan71828007 There were some Slayer additions earlier this year, actually, though perhaps not the sort you were looking for. What particularly would you have liked it to be, if we were doing one?
Cheers :)
@zurphdog Is it still a F2P account? If you were planning on using it in w45, you'd presumably have to get it membership first, and I think that'd get you past the restriction automatically.
@MailorSoon It certainly looks intentional, though it might have been a nice touch if it skipped the charge deduction if it couldn't have given you the item (or XP) anyway. Maybe we'll get to tweak that at some point.
@mandarochen The hope had been that players might be able to use the recruitment boards for that, and since CoX uses those chat-channels for its own parties, it could get really confusing if you were using one of them for this purpose. Might be good for ToB though.
@hypers Maybe indeed. It's just harder to get dev time approved for something if there's little prospect of major uptake, even if it might lead to more user-generated content online - it'd always be competing for time against other potential projects that players want.
@JPlistens I'm sorry to hear that. If you're looking to report players, you'd do better trying the Support team, as they can review accounts and apply sanctions. They're JagexSupport on this platform.
@NelsonNelson987 I'd guess at that getting polled within the next few weeks. Delivery would presumably depend on the outcome of that; I'm afraid I don't know when to hope for that. If you're short of bankspace in the meantime, maybe you can buy a bit more off the bankers? :P
@Im_Stegali :) I'd expect the most functional impact would be on UIM, for whom it makes a difference whether something's in a set. Maybe a restricted poll would be most appropriate, in that case.
devtrackers.gg
