Braddock512

Originally posted by KGrahnn

If I say ”Braddock deserves a prize” It doesnt mean Im handing prizes out. If someone deserves a slap - like a kid doing something awful, it doesnt mean Im slapping a kid either. It means they deserve it from something they did, and from something usualy which is not proper behaviour. Its not a threat.

In other hand - did you ever apologize from that guy. In that subject I made wild guess that you did not, and I might be wrong.

Originally posted by Heiska76

Thank's Mr Braddock512 that you comment this threat. So i have to find some more evidence. That is a small steap a head to know that now. Where do i send all the material i have?

Originally posted by Xanviour1

Why are people not given the specific reason as to why they are banned? It may have been reviewed by a human but players seem to get pre written responses.

Evidence should be provided by the anti cheat team, not the player. How is anybody supposed to prove they weren’t cheating?

I fortunately have never had an issue but there have been so many reports on here of people believing they have been banned unfairly that I think it’s likely at least some of them were. The few that were have no way of knowing what exactly they have been banned for.

Originally posted by Dr-Cox83

Yeah the stats are bugged, another bug Dice can't fix, don't take care of this troll.

Originally posted by Dr-Cox83

He got banned, EA support don't give a true answer on why he got banned and give only preset answer, 99% without doing any check on the reason of the ban.

Considered the precedent behaviour of Dice, lying about checking fake bans, they are probably try yo hide the problem again.

You can see an example here

https://forums.battlefield.com/en-us/discussion/comment/660800/#Comment_660800

And here the same Dice developer saying Fairfight(the anticheat) is banning automatically legit players for error.

https://twitter.com/bfbulletin/status/847204229383114752

A perfect example of how they lying.

Originally posted by KGrahnn

Yes indeed. Braddock and the other one "Sabz" were "so sure of themselves" that they are right, and even closed the tread to prevent further pleading.

Problem lies in their nature to not be really interested if the cases are false or not. systems get some cheaters and along the way some false positives, and they accept collateral damage along the way. "No big deal for them".

But for the individual it might be a HUGE deal. He might have created whole personality into that identity, which is taken away on a whim. And he is not getting any help to redeem it, since people in other end do not really care.

I cant see braddock even apologizing there for backing Sabz making claims which are untrue - which would be fking least he could do, when being outright fking wrong. Guy deserves a slap onto his face for being a rude bastard like that.

Originally posted by Dr-Cox83

I'm trying to explain you there is no new approach.

From Battlefield 1 they have both approach stats based(probably human based) and automatic program check(no human check).

They removed the stats based, but they continue to use the automatic program check, and if they do another time a bad modify, this can lead again to fake bans.

I trust more a player than Dice considered they lied for 1-2 months about this problem in Battlefield 1.(for the stats of this player they are really bugged, i have too thanks to firestorm)

We will see after this comment.

Originally posted by Slashette

Thats why we lost our DEDI servers cause of whiners! We ran a amazing server, and kicked people who were nasty and beligerant.. i was told i was a badmin all the time.. so what will you guys constitute a badmin???

Originally posted by orange_jooze

(redeemable in Origin or on Origin.comfor all platforms attached to the account)

Between this and Battlefront II's CTs, it seems that folks at DICE have never heard of a thing called "proofreading".

Originally posted by Slashette

So this is really just a game mode andnot servers???

Originally posted by johgru

Sorry for going off topic /u/PartWelsh but you mentioned that you would shed some light on the max level situation early this week. Is that still the case?

Originally posted by Everyonedies-

Can you push for a change in the assignment for gold camos?

Originally posted by mntblnk

u/Braddock512

So we're not getting vehicle class customisation. That's totally fine. But please, pretty please change the existing vehicle class characters to resemble someone that would fly a plane or drive a tank in WW2

Originally posted by HUNjozsi

Yeah I am glad about that, but the previous "This Week in Battlefield V" post said it was coming yesterday

Either way, I am excited :)

Originally posted by R181Ben

Fix the vehicle spawn bug and airplane resupply bug. Both are practically gamebreaking bugs that make me want to drop your game indefinitely when they occur.

Originally posted by MadMan04

I feel awful for the spot you're in man, but appreciative of the fact that you let us know whatever you can when you can. This is just crazy frustrating.

Maybe pass along to the team that next time they should hold back some of the gas masks and goggles for emergencies like this week.

Originally posted by HUNjozsi

Wasn't the Fortress mode supposed to be released yesterday? :c

Originally posted by MadMan04

...won't they be earning at least 5K in CC just by playing the week's TOW assignments?

You don't think they'd rather have literally anything other than CC they can earn a million other ways, not to mention CC that is next to useless at this point anyway?

This is wild.

Originally posted by everymansic

i honestly think that for week 8, all the players should just simply not play. this would be to protest the horrible 5k cc they are giving us.

thats an insult to the player base who put hours into the game who have a crap ton of cc already.