pathetic trying to manipulate people to vote yes by going on about "hard work"
Yikers.
To clarify, the reasoning I'm highlighting the effort put in by the team is that some people have preset judgements on Warding that may no longer be relevant based on the changes from this blog. I'm simply asking to perhaps give the blog a read before giving out an opinion based on older blogs.
If your opinion is still no, that's fine. Feel free to vote no.
The effort needs to be put into account security, the glaring bot problem and other pertinent issues that are a shared concern of the community.
Work is already being put into these initiatives as you've seen with the account security blogs.
That being said, the people working on this are not the same people who are working on security initiatives - nor could they be. That's like asking a police officer to be a doctor as more doctors are desired.
oh boy here we go
I'm not personally working on Warding but the effort put into this by the people involved is extremely large.
They've tried their hardest to implement all feedback given and have worked out a lot of the kinks people had with the initial design.
If nothing more, I implore anyone and everyone to at least give the updated blog a full read and vote with an open mind and fresh slate as the changes made may change your opinion. If that vote is a no, so be it, but as Kieren says in the video: we truly just want to make something you all want.
The quality of this sub the past few months has been insane.
This is incredible! Awesome work.
People barraged them in the chaos tunnels for effigies
That was a way to do it, but it was a bit meh. The ones which spawn from the tombs got auto killed with 1 fire strike.
I know of at least 15 undiscovered equipables (i.e. not listed on the wiki), including 2 entire sets that I've never seen anyone else wear in-game or discuss on public forums.
The floodgates opened on the 3rd week of Crack The Clue 1, but I know some veterans have obtained items that were clearly designed and hidden as far back as 2004.
edit: bruh
Press X to doubt.
Tell us another Easter egg that’s not well known!
Your pet rock is alive.
Would be nice if we get effigies in osrs. Back in the day it was the best way to train runecrafting
It's a hard pass from me I'm afraid.
I'm surprised this is an easter egg not many know about. This was a huge thing back in the day to gain effigies.
It's always awesome people find Easter Eggs in this game - it's incredible how many there are!
What would happen if a player bathed in a potion?
I guess they absorb the effect for longer?
Or they could potentially sell a small tub of it for 30gp.
How far does the rabbit hole go.
[deleted]
Alternatively we gather your feedback and update the blog addressing all concerns and feedback all at once like we usually do instead of drip feeding through comments 😅
Think we can unnerf serp helm now that we know your quest will never take off? You really hurt defence tanks in the wild, are you the one pushing for a dihns nerf too wolf? Why do you hate the defence stats in osrs, WHY WOLF WHY! Let me catch chins in peace wolfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Yikers.
I didn't actually instigate the Serp helm nerf. However, doing that much free damage without attacking back was something our team disliked so I don't regret that change.
The strength was a little too far for sure but that's back on now.
The upside of being originally built for dial-up modems and 256Mb of RAM! We went full circle.
200 IQ - Andrew 100% knew back in 2003 that the system would go on mobile. Probably.
We've added it to the news post :)
The rune armour and weaponry got me.
You found it! :eyes:
This is literally the saltiest post ever.
I’ve done much saltier!
No, it was literally just a pun name like most other pets.
FYI, Siracha is a type of chilli sauce and not a brand in the same way Kleenex is a brand not the name of the item “tissue”.
Here’s a fun read for you: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_trademark
Enjoy the update!
What OC means please?
Original content.
devtrackers.gg