War Thunder

War Thunder Dev Tracker




08 Jan

Post
    Stona on Forums - Thread - Direct

Hey folks! You are watching Thunder Show - redesigned and redefined!


We will no longer limit you and ourselves to strict categories, yeah, we got rid of them! Now we’ll feature only the best videos of the week. You can find our new and simplified terms of participation at the end of this episode.


Oh and by the way - we’re expanding Thunder Show to FIVE videos per episode! As for the rest - it’s business as usual! You are watching Thunder Show, a weekly project of which you can be a part of! New episode every Friday!












More about the Thunder Show


Do you have a War Thunder video you would like to share with the world? An epic scene of heroism, a hilarious mistake or just random awesomeness? Then listen up! Every week in the Thunder Show,...

Read more
Post
    OrsonES on Forums - Thread - Direct

In connection with the received complaints regarding EULA and game rule violation by teams “EzPiZy” and “___” in the Gladiators CUP RB tournament; we have checked the whole situation. The result is that in the match A29, conducted between teams “EzPiZy” and “BRUH” and in the match A30 between teams “Verve” and “___”, players Knodels and WindXABK used an exploit that allowed a reset to the zone capture progress for the team that had the advantage. In effect, they blocked the continuation of the mission rounds by waiting for the timed end of the match by preventing their opponents from completing a fair match.


Players keve20, _Foxwpzdc_, _tonyolo_, WindXABK, x_Andrew_x, Knodels, BaroN303, [email protected], _V1nny_, I__Nemesis__I, Renamedovich and _botya_ have been banned from the game until 19:00 GMT on the 8th of January, disqualified from the Gladiators CUP RB tournament and will not be able to take part in any tournaments on the TSS until 30 da...

Read more
Comment

If it was removed, then it did not follow the guidelines.


I will need to see the report to know why exactly.

Comment

Nobody has called your reports a waste of time or discarded them meaninglessly. You failed to follow the guidelines when submitting them and then rather than simply correct them, you went to the Russian forum and fired the same reports with no changes.


You were not spamming and that's not the issue here.

Comment
    Stona on Forums - Thread - Direct

Hi!

If you want to suggest new machines, please check suggestion section on our forum.


Cheers!

Comment
    Stona on Forums - Thread - Direct

You need to level up.

First rank is given after you get 12th level.


You can check it on our wiki

Comment
    Stona on Forums - Thread - Direct

Please re-read forum rules and try again.


Cheers!

Comment

They are not being hidden because on the Russian forum, reports are simply left open and never actioned if they are not following the rules. We prefer to close them so the user knows they did not follow the rules and must resubmit them if it was wrong. If your post was hidden or rejected, it means you did not follow the guidelines.


No moderator is trying to "stop" your reports. Thats not how things work. Several Technical Moderators have tried to talk to you about the way you approach things, but you have ignored their advice.


07 Jan

Comment

Again, thats not this forum and I cant speak for that one.

Comment

I have not seen the source, I am going by what was said here in this topic and this topic is not a bug report and no source has been posted.


It needs to be submitted properly under the correct area and then can be investigated.


Im not going to comment on what reports are / are not accepted on the Russian forum, because thats not my domain.

Comment

Bug reports being fixed has no baring on what nation they come from. A Japanese tank bug is treated no differently to an American tank issue. What matters is sources and the correct evidence / material.



Please do not submit duplicate reports both on the .com and .ru forum. Not following the guidelines and what's required on one forum does not mean it will be accepted on the other. Bugs wont be accepted this way.

Comment

As I said previously, event vehicles need to be interesting and something people want to actually obtain. This version of the EBR is the most interesting and desirable for those people who are not just focused on the French tree.


If you believe you have proper documentation to back that claim up, please submit it via a historical report. Quoting a random source (particularly American) is not really viable here.


As for its wheels, the game does not make any distinguishment between 4 x 4 or 8 x 8 wheels due to how they are currently designed. So the ability to retract is wheels if implemented now would be a purely visual matter and not have any gameplay relevance.

Comment

Not really sure what you mean here?


If your referring to the EBR. It has multiple variants, Like the Puma and like the Sd.kfz.251 and many other vehicles.


It also proved to be the correct choice as it was a popular event vehicle, that lots of people went for.

Comment

Whilst I work for the game I am also just 1 player too. My feedback is not more important than any other single player.



We share our opinions and thoughts when its relevant to do so on a subject that requires personal opinion when it comes down to that. This is not one of them, as the largest factor in deciding if a BR is wrong is what the statistics show. Not what a singular person, no matter who they are personally feels about something. Indeed I can and do offer my recommendations, as thats my job. But my personal opinion does not come into it.


As for the Harrier, that was a very simple test. The person claimed you lost 14-17k per game with the Harrier every time at 10.0. What I posted was simply to show that even a not great jet pilot like me can somehow walk away with 230k+ after several 10.0 - 10.7 games in GR.1.



I thin...

Read more
Comment

I'm not sure why your so keen to get my experience, because it is meaningless what I think of it as I or any other member of staff here does not control BRs or Weaponry. We are here to forward player feedback to the developers, which we have been doing.

Comment

We had mixed and there was also just as much opposition. The possibility for the MM to create a mixed battle still remains, but at a much lower chance.


As for team composition, as is made very clear by your screenshots, the number of people playing PFM at the moment is going to greatly skew the matchmaker simply down to how much people are playing it. So these screenshots don't really tell a lot other than what's currently being played a lot due to being a new event vehicle.