A friend bought me Coven Morgana not long ago, so I did some research on the archaic english she uses. I couldn't help but notice the quote she says when meeting Coven Lissandra:
"What visions dost thou chase, Lissandra? What truth hast been revealed to thee?"
Now, I'm not a native speaker, so I could be wrong on this, but according to google:
hast
archaic second person singular present of have.
This would make 'hast' the archaic version of have, not has. The correct form would be:
hath
archaic third person singular present of have.
Can anyone (hopefully better at the language than I) confirm this is a mistake, or tell me why 'hast' is actually correct in the above sentence?
External link →