[2020] Low Play rate doesn’t mean a champion shouldn’t be nerfed

Originally posted by ImKrypton

His breadth is stupidly low yet he HAS borderline median DEPTH. People that all have 1 game on him have exactly that 1 game. It won't reflect on DEPTH at all. Yet he has that depth.

edit: /u/NovaAsterix, please could you help with this one?

Originally posted by bns18js

Ok. So it means they have A TINY AMOUNT of EXTREMELY dedicated players. However as a % of the overall players who play a certain champ, they're still a tiny minority. This has to to be the case by default right? Where as if you compare to yasuo, there is probably a much higher % of its player base who can be said to "main" him.

Depth as defined in the graph = total number of games/total number of unique players. This metric is shown to be low for A-sol. When you're saying "A-sol has high depth", you're talking about a different definition.

I'm saying only a tiny % of the A-sol players are mains(the champ is not mostly played by mains). But you're saying that tiny % plays him a shit ton(the few mains he has plays him alot).

Am I misunderstanding anything where? Thanks for the input. But I think this new info isn't contradictory to anything I said before.