Original Post — Direct link

https://preview.redd.it/967fd7o1yy361.jpg?width=1215&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=53586ef9384224c8a2f2d2282f8e6bc022447418

It's my favorite skinline and it's really cheap.

The gothic style is neat and each character looks very unique, especially for 750 RP. I think the shared splash art may have been the skinline's undoing, as I can imagine people going nuts over the individual skins if they each had a fully detailed splash of their own.

Money talks, so Riot can't be faulted for not making more in the same style. I just wish it had done better.

External link →
about 4 years ago - /u/Bellissimoh - Direct link

Originally posted by KasumiGotoTriss

Those 3 aren't popular champions at all though.. Riot always tries interesting skinlines with champs no one plays like the paper Anivia and Nunu, and then they act surprised that they didn't sell that well and these skinlines are never seen again.

We actually adjust expectations and performance benchmarks on a per champion basis. So if we say something like “Papercraft didn’t perform well” that doesn’t mean we’re comparing Papercraft against KDA. It means we’re comparing Papercraft Anivia against other Anivia skins and evaluating whether the core audience for that champion really liked it.