Original Post — Direct link

Examples of strong males leads that the players have largely liked (even admittedly by Jagex). These are off the top of my head:

  • Nomad (killed off)

  • Zaros (written out because too powerful)

  • Zamorak (written out because bad guys can't win)

  • Saradomin (written out because too powerful)

  • Armadyl (written out because too powerful)

  • Bandos (killed off because of a player vote)

  • Lucien (killed off)

  • Sliske (killed off, then attempted revival but writers then killed him off again)

  • Icthlarin (written out, possibly involved in Necromancy, too powerful otherwise)

  • Azzanadra (written out because too powerful)

And characters involved in the current Runescape storyline:

  • The Raptor (written out in a story he wasn't the focus of. Was an afterthought to give a more important character characterization.)

  • Death (main character in Necromancy)

  • Zemouregal (not written off yet, active in the current story with morally ambiguous intentions).

I don't want to blame a specific JMod for writting these characters off because I don't know for a fact but it seems like all of these characters were written off because as Jack said, the writers do not like writing about them.

Edit: I forgot Kerapac. Especially Kerapac. Kerapac is probably a better example than anyone on this list but his death is well justified as he sacrifices himself to kill one of the longest running antagonists in the game's history.

Vindicta is a strong female character that's preceived positively by the players as well.

External link →
over 1 year ago - /u/JagexJack - Direct link

Nah you're misinterpreting me here.

I'm not talking about "male characters" I'm talking about a very specific archetype. As I said on the stream there's a whole stream on each of these topics so I was just giving quick answers, but the Raptor isn't just "a male character". He's stoic, strong, powerful, never admits defeat, says little, values power in others, doesn't care for deception, and so on.

Most of the characters on your list aren't really in that archetype. Sliske is almost the opposite of those traits: capricious, duplicitous, smarmy, eloquent, rambling.

the writers do not like writing about them.

Again I'm talking specifically about the stoic archetype. The only other character I can think of that really fits well is Zuk. I'm sure there are others but part of what I'm acknowledging is that there aren't many. Ironically of the major characters in recent storylines I think the one who most fits the archetype is actually Saradomin. Zaros is also sort of stoic, and has the "powerful winner" vibe, but is also duplicitous and more of a sort of winning through magic and intellect rather than sheer power and strength and conviction. Nothing wrong with that archetype, but it's more Raistlin than Conan.

In contrast to what you're saying, we love writing about most of the characters in your list. Part of the reason the Sixth Age played out the way it did is how much we loved writing those characters and exploring their identities.

Saradomin's need to do the right thing always at risk of being overwhelmed by thousands of years of arrogance based on being the most powerful being on the planet. Zamorak's surprising penchant for liberty underpinning a colossal antipathy and hatred for structure and civilisation. Zaros's frankly frightening world-ending power limited only by the patient willingness to wait a mortal lifetime to see his plans come to fruition.

Ultimately those characters had to be written out because they were limiting our ability to do anything else, not because we didn't like them.

over 1 year ago - /u/JagexJack - Direct link

Originally posted by 79215185-1feb-44c6

Thanks for the feedback. When I wrote this post up my initial reaction was actually Nomad which was killed off as a character multiple times and is still used in promotional material (he's all over the Steam version of the game) because apparently he gets positive reactions by the fans. Do you have any real intentions of including a character like him in the future?

Zemouregal is also a character I like a lot. He seems to be the next in line for "Mahjarrat that are going to be written off." I find that a lot of the Mahjarrat are more self-centered and less evil based on their long history with Zaros and are only perceived as evil because their motives do not frequently align with Gielinor's best interests. If by chance Zemo's interests were aligned with Gielinor's maybe he could end up being seen as an ally? Azzy had similar character development until he became too powerful to say on Gielinor.

Yeah honestly I think the point about Nomad is a really good one. He's barely a character, but he's (I assume, I haven't been involved in that sort of decision) proven powerful as a marketing asset.

I can't promise anything specific on any timescale, but broadly yes my big takeaway here is "there's a whole character archetype here that we're missing that a lot of our audience really want to see".

As for Zemouregal, for me he doesn't do a good job of satisfying the right need. I mean I'm interested in hearing from you and others but I feel like Zemouregal has been too demeaned and mocked in the past to really work in this role.

over 1 year ago - /u/JagexJack - Direct link

Originally posted by RS_Owlnine

Part of the problem here, for me at least, is this:

"He's stoic, strong, powerful, never admits defeat, says little, values power in others, doesn't care for deception, and so on."

Ellamaria is not most of these things. She's not stoic. She talks a lot. She seemingly cares for others, regardless of their combat prowess (Roald), she is the one doing the deceiving.

I want to think of the Raptor as being the character he seems he is. But I can't with Ellamaria. The Raptor is just an act. A mask. I now know that the person under that helmet doesn't think the way they speak. It feels like Ellamaria has replaced the Raptor.

Also, if I might ask: Why was the decision made to unmask the Raptor at all?

This is what I talk about in the livestream.

over 1 year ago - /u/JagexJack - Direct link

Originally posted by RS_Owlnine

Wasn't aware there was a stream. Just went and watched the VOD.

So, if I am understanding this correctly, I think the gist of your answer to "Why unmask the Raptor" is basically that the Raptor wasn't being valued as a character, and was used as a tool to further Ellamaria's character. Which isn't quite the way that you worded it, but I believe that's the gist of it, in a nutshell? Do correct me if that's wrong. That's what I am getting from the multiple answers given, such as not realizing people liked the Raptor that much, or that it was an Ellamaria reveal, and not a Raptor reveal. And it sucks, but it is what it is. We're here now.

To provide my feedback on some questions you posed to the chat during the stream:

Yes. I do think it is enough to have a quest companion like the Raptor show up, and just kind've be there, as a fellow adventurer. I didn't need a story about the Raptor, or for the Raptor to drive the story forward. He's a character that I liked, and I was getting to see more of him. That's rad. I would like to see more of that kind've thing in the future. I believe this is, in part, what the signature heroes were originally for.

I would like to see more characters like that in the future. It sucks that the consensus seems to be that the Raptor is dead as a character, sacrificed to learn a lesson, and who knows if a replacement stoic-warrior character will resonate the same way.

I appreciate you responding to the issue though. I've been frustrated by Jagex's silence on the subject of his character of late, while they have been active responding to other feedback. It felt like this issue was going to be ignored, so I do appreciate the honest communication about it.

Yeah that's spot on.