That is an interesting one... we'll take a look.
That is an interesting one... we'll take a look.
LOL the classic βAh shit we should of found this oneβ response π
I mean we try to find as much bugs before we put it live, we're human and with a complicated game like RS3 this it's not always possible to avoid something like this.
What bothers me more personally are the responses from players claiming our QA colleagues are terrible and/or not doing anything. They're a bunch of passionate, very hard working colleagues and knowing that they have to read comments like that is not cool imo.
FYI, yours is not one those :) it just made me think of it.
Really though, how does this pass through? I can understand more obscure bugs, and can even understand the current combat bug, but these noted items are literally primary use case. It's like adding a new weapon without testing you can actually equip the weapon. Maybe there's something I'm missing that you can shed light on rather than playing the victim card, but this really does just seem inexcusable.
I can't give a technical answer because I'm not a QA myself but I would think that using the sticks would be the primary use case. Maybe one of our QA's is willing to elaborate.