Gotta say, after getting used to the one we have now it's genuinely a shame we'll go back to... this creepy thing lmao
No offense to the artist, but the one we have now is literally perfect and shouldn't be changed
Gotta say, after getting used to the one we have now it's genuinely a shame we'll go back to... this creepy thing lmao
No offense to the artist, but the one we have now is literally perfect and shouldn't be changed
[removed]
You can disagree with someone all you want but even insinuating that a drawing of a child is related to a sexualized face made by a porn star, is borderline insane.
I don't know why I even need to say this
[removed]
Listen - I don't plan to argue this. I understand what you meant, my point is just that it is weird to look at a drawing of a child's face that is perfectly fine and go "why yes, that sure looks like Belle Delphine".
[removed]
Listen - nobody is accusing your of anything. If you want to disagree with me that it's a weird comparison to make, you're more than welcome to disagree.
And yea, I'm removing the comment, cause this is a PG-13 sub and we should keep it that way.
[removed]
We have always been a PG-13 sub? Feel free to wayback our rules or something, that hasn't changed as of recent. Sure, that rule gets broken more often than others, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't do our best to keep it that way.
Also, that's the whole reason why this whole discussion is being removed - it's just not appropriate.
Also also, like last 3 comments of the chain you have with me have been auto-removed by reddit and flagged to us - you don't have to believe me but just sayin.
[removed]
A discussion about how Jing Wei is similar to Belle Delphine is not PG-13. Again, you're welcome to disagree.
However, I agree with you on one thing and that is that this discussion should end. I won't be locking comments, but I'd ask you not to continue it.