11 months
ago -
War Thunder. Official channel.
-
Direct link
Transcript (by Youtube)
5s | The Su-25, a Soviet jet-powered CAS aircraft, |
---|---|
10s | was developed for roughly the same reasons as the American A-10 Thunderbolt II. |
15s | After WW2, both superpowers came to the conclusion |
19s | that there was no need for a dedicated ground attack aircraft anymore. |
23s | After the harsh lessons of the Vietnam War, though, |
25s | the US immediately revised their policy |
28s | and started working on a new jet-powered attack aircraft. |
35s | The Soviet top brass weren’t as quick on the uptake, |
38s | and that’s why the aircraft that we now know as the Su-25 |
42s | was initially developed basically as an unofficial passion project. |
46s | There were no technical specifications, no contract, and no money. |
50s | Even more than that, at the very beginning, |
53s | engineers Ivanov and Samoilovich |
55s | looked into the possibility of making such an aircraft |
58s | without even notifying the chief designer of their bureau, Pavel Sukhoi. |
63s | When he learned about the project, though, he immediately offered his support... |
67s | but the military decision makers proved to be much harder to impress. |
71s | Some of them didn’t really know what they wanted; |
74s | others wanted something completely different from what engineers had to offer. |
78s | Some officials were dreaming about a new fighter-bomber like the Su-17 |
83s | or a new ground-attack aircraft like the MiG-27. |
87s | Others envisioned a multi-seater design with defensive turrets, like the Il-28. |
96s | Naturally, the development process was fraught with difficulties. |
100s | Even at the early stage of developing the first operational prototype, |
104s | the project was hampered by heated debates and fierce competition. |
108s | In the end, engineers at the Sukhoi OKB decided |
112s | not to follow in the footsteps of their American counterparts: |
116s | as far as similarities go, the A-10 and the Su-25 |
120s | were both designed to play a similar role and were both subsonic, |
124s | but that was about it. |
125s | Unlike the A-10, the Soviet attacker wasn’t designed around a specific gun. |
130s | Instead, engineers built it around the idea |
133s | of being able to carry as many bombs and missiles as possible. |
138s | Other key features included excellent maneuverability |
141s | at a range of different speeds and superior survivability. |
145s | Thankfully, Soviet engineers had a lot of experience in all of those aspects. |
153s | The team at Sukhoi were already working on their first operational prototype |
157s | when the project was finally recognised on the official level. |
161s | On the 22nd of February 1975, Vladimir Ilyushin, |
165s | the chief test pilot for the Sukhoi OKB, |
168s | took the prototype to the skies for the very first time, |
172s | and it didn’t take long after that for the first production attackers |
175s | to be used in the skies of Afghanistan. |
178s | The Soviet Air Forces were pretty happy with the Su-25 |
182s | as it quickly proved to be superior to the Su-17, the MiG-27, and the Yak-38. |
189s | First, the new ground attack aircraft |
191s | could be used from improvised or barely prepared airfields. |
195s | Second, it had excellent subsonic maneuverability |
198s | allowing it to hit small or hard to reach targets with precision. |
202s | Third, it could take a lot of punishment: |
205s | the plane could shrug off machine gun fire with relative ease, |
208s | and even Stingers were not always successful in striking it down. |
220s | Engineers kept improving and upgrading the Su-25, but that wasn’t enough: |
225s | to keep up with the times, it had to be modified to carry smart munitions |
229s | like guided bombs and laser-guided anti-tank missiles. |
233s | Another big thing was to give it all-weather capability, |
236s | allowing it to operate both day and night |
239s | and equip it with more advanced navigation tools. |
242s | To achieve that, the Soviets had to install a lot of new avionics systems, |
246s | most notably a new multi-function radar. |
253s | Some of those goals were achieved in the mid-1980s, |
256s | when the USSR introduced a new variant of the Su-25, |
260s | the Su-25T. |
262s | Engineers converted a two-seater variant back into a one-seater, |
266s | filling the extra space with equipment required for smart bombs and missiles. |
270s | The aircraft had the same recognisable profile but became an almost perfect |
275s | high-precision weapon against armored targets on the ground. |
279s | The USSR, though, didn’t get to use it, |
281s | as its first combat operations happened after the collapse of the Soviet Union. |
289s | But the world didn’t end with the dissolution of the Soviet empire, |
292s | and the way the few Su-25T aircraft built in the last years of the USSR were used, |
299s | suggested several possible directions for the future of the series. |
303s | First of all, the aircraft of the Su-25 family were highly sought after abroad: |
309s | the sturdy and effective Grach, also known as “Frogfoot” |
312s | and named “Raschoska”, or “Comb”, by its pilots, |
316s | caught the interest of the military all around the world, |
319s | from the Middle East to South America. |
322s | Even though ultimately there weren’t that many buyers for a very niche aircraft, |
326s | there was enough interest to warrant the development of the new Su-25TM variant |
332s | that took to the skies in 1995. |
335s | It was modified to support an even wider range of air-to-ground weaponry, |
339s | including new tools to use against fast-moving and small targets. |
344s | But the biggest new change was that the Su-25TM |
347s | could carry the Kopyo-25 radar in an under fuselage container, |
352s | facilitating the use of long-range air-to-surface missiles. |
356s | The export version of the Su-25TM was designated “Su-39”. |
362s | Right now, it’s the most advanced and fearsome model in the whole series. |
368s | The aircraft of the Su-25 series remain in active service in the real world, |
373s | but you can also test their capabilities in War Thunder: |
377s | there are both researchable and premium variants of this attacker waiting for you |
381s | at the very top of the Soviet tech tree. |
384s | And yes, that even includes the Su-39. |
387s | What do you think about these flying tank destroyers? |
391s | Tell us in the comments below... |