If there is something in the devblog stats that you find particularly off putting about a ship announced, I encourage you to be specific with it.
”It’s not what I wanted” is hard to work with.
The goal is to get a super-ship on plenty of branches, so I would expect them. I myself want a T10 German O-Class with an ice-breaker and a 40mm deck, but we’ll just have to wait!
I agree - there are lots of new options and playstyles that can come out of the Supership project.
Sounds like you want superships buffed? They're pretty darn strong as it is...
Annapolis and Conde may lose DPM over time using burst-fire, but the reason is because bursting has a massive utility that straight DPM does not.
Hannover has suspect accuracy, for sure, but that's the make up for the fact that the secondaries have monstrous power in them when played correctly. You don't have to land shells to buff the alt-fire ability, btw - you just need to aim at and land the shells nearby.
Not all superships will have an alt-fire mode or special ability. Some may simply be awesome ships!
I'm afraid I don't have a roadmap for you on this. There are multiple superships planned already with Edgar in testing currently and Clausewitz on the devblog - so I would take that pattern and repeat it if I were a bettin' man!
devtrackers.gg