over 4 years ago - Hapa_Fodder - Direct link

Aloha,

Once again I remind the community that stat shaming is NOT allowed.

Everyone is allowed their own opinion.

That being said from someone with a 56% W/R across 12,000+ battles (test ships included)

I really don't care for, nor do I play the Soviet ships. I haven't for a VERY long time. With the exception of Leningrad, Gremy and Lenin (notice no tech tree ships)

If I have to pick a tier X BB, I will run a German, US or French before I pick Kremlin, but that is just me, because that is what I prefer.

And I own every tech tree X.

Also, these are TEST ships currently and adjustments will occur, I will tell you I have punished and seen some of these ships punished because they have to be fairly close in to be super effective.

People talked about how "OP" a Moskva is, but have you ever shot at one that was "bow tanking" with a Montana at range and chunked damage of them? Cause it's super easy.

Stalingrad? Burn that bad bow down...

Just my 2 doubloons

Mahalo,

-Hapa

over 4 years ago - Hapa_Fodder - Direct link

So by your argument, using the Kremlin as an example:

Just curious have you looked at the stats comparing Kremlin to all other Tier X BB's? On NA at least, Kremlin is 3rd for W/R, 3rd for Avg Kills, 4th for Avg Dmg, 4th for Avg XP and 5th for Avg K/D.

The only thing she is #1 for at least on NA is Aircraft kills and we have been nerfing her AA to compensate.

In the hands of a good player, just about any ship can out and over perform.

-Hapa

over 4 years ago - Hapa_Fodder - Direct link