@Kirillr_17 @Thafnine Tbh I like the 2013, it technically has more depth (if we're talking about detail here) even though gradients don't always work for me.
@LegacyAN_ They even automatically rejected it, it seems. Since it was requested and then a minute later a rejection email sent. I refuse to believe humans looked at that request,
@happy156_ There are already a few who have written articles about me, and I submitted them. Instantly rejected a minute later, likely because of a bot. Any ideas @verified ?
I'd love to know @verified, what constitutes as notable? What do the articles need? They mention me many times. I submitted both gaming journalist websites such as TheGamer and others like The Washington Post. It is extremely unclear what criteria is needed for google trends too.
At least some clarity as to why a request is rejected would help immensely because it's to the point where I just won't try requesting anymore.
Only reason this is important to me is so that if our players see a fake "kingbdogz" profile, they know the information is not legit.
Being a game developer on this platform for a huge game like Minecraft can be extremely annoying when there are multiple fake "mojang developer" accounts everywhere, not just myself but of others pretending to be devs.
@_JaneyLaney I guess be rich or have literally millions of followers. At least if they just said "you need to have at least X amount of followers", then I'd get it. But the lack of transparency is just not okay. Verification is easy on literally every other platform, Youtube for example.
@paulsoaresjr The problem is their classification of what verified means. For me I just want it to mean "I'm this real individual, not a fake". I don't care about status or anything. That is completely unimportant to me.
devtrackers.gg
