Originally posted by
Azdrubel
Which is kinda funny if you compare it to similar cases of literal modifiers. I mean, it's obviously unintended and op, I won't debate that, but it's funny.
The modifier "increased effect of non-curse auras on you" has never affected Pride, because Pride doesn't affect the player. This has never been considered a bug because that's literally how the modifier works. But the exact same wording is used on Eternal Blessing and now that is a bug. It's not a bug. It's a f**k-up. They just f**ked it up.
I mean the same thing can't be, simultaneously, a bug when it's advantageous to the players and not a bug when it's disadvantageous. But yeah, GGG said it's a bug so that must be it.
But the exact same wording is used on Eternal Blessing and now that is a bug.
That is not the "exact same wording". There is a distinction between an aura being on you (you are the source/centre for the aura), and an aura having an effect on you (the aura is applying stats to you). An aura can be on you and not have any effect on you (pride), or can have an effect on you without being on you (an ally's aura buff).
The wording you quote is specifically modifying the effect that certain auras have on you. It does not care whether those auras themselves are on you or not - it has always modified the effect that ally's auras have on you, despite those auras not being on you. The wording is directly analagous to e.g. "x% increased effect of Arcane Surge on you" - it's an effect modifier.
Eternal Blessing refers to auras being on you, regardless of whether they have an effect on you, as did the old Mortal Conviction keystone. This is not a new distinction.