[2019] Comp Cape Design Definitions Update

Originally posted by Tyki_Mikk

Super minor, but I like exploration over areas, just sounds nicer.

In general, still happy with how this is progressing and the idea nothing should be worse than 1k telos or castle wars. Also keeping skills at 120 all for insane which is an actual level instead of 200m all which only exists because of coding stuff instead being a meaning cutoff. There can still be niche rewards for those players who go farther like golden warden.

I think the three tiers of comp are really nice as well and well defined. Ready to see concept art.

For pvm, as long as group bosses aren't removed entirely (which they don't seem to be going that direction), I'm happy whether it's t1 or t2. I think it should stay t1, but compromising on tier 2 is fine.

Originally posted by Jona_than

"Tier 3 Combat - All combat achievements (including ones that are insane, but nothing harder than 1k enrage Telos)"

Can't be that insane if it can't be harder than 1k enr telos lmao

Originally posted by 5-x

Now a matter of deciding on what classifies as "insane" and what doesn't. I suspect this is going to be hotly debated.

Also, shouldn't 120 Slayer, Dg, and Invention be t2 skilling? Wasn't t1 skilling supposed to be effectively max cape?

I still think recognising virtual 120s makes no sense.

Edit: Wait, current trimmed comp will now require warden? That's ridiculous...

Originally posted by Ik_oClock

I have some suggestions for quest achievements that are not in the current system (SE replay outfit), but:

Why is Nomad replay in the combat and not lore section?

Originally posted by PrimalMoose

I like the idea of splitting up the group bosses and the "normal" bosses, but concerned about how you would then deal with the inevitable comp cape stats debate. You'd almost have to have an increment above current max cape for the t1 comp, followed by another small bump once the group bosses are completed?

Originally posted by ImRubic

I remember when Minigames used to be called Minigames, then it was renamed to Activities, then Jagex forgot they did that so they defaulted back to Minigames.

So my question is, are we going back to the Activities name for good now or is this a general category name for things beyond just minigames and D&Ds (things that don't fall into other categories)?

Originally posted by RS_Horrors

I think 4k enrage Telos should be insane requirement. Even though I don't think I'll ever accomplish that feat, it'd be cool to see something really prestigious

Originally posted by RoskatRS

Broken home challenges insane? Is this a joke? If you are able to complete all quests, then you are able to do those challenges, with or without guide. If it had to be completed in 19mins, then sure

10000 Corrupted creatures insane=afk for 10-11 hours

Originally posted by kunair

Leave it as "exploration" pls, it sounds so much better ty

Originally posted by Xenon_Ray

with the current spreadsheet, t3 lore and combat are terribly underwhelming, it's basically free for anyone who wants t3s, would definitely like to know the reason for putting such relatively easy achievements on t3, as that would probably be the base for the new reqs on it