Wouldn't be the first time dataming is wrong. Things are chanced constantly.
Wouldn't be the first time dataming is wrong. Things are chanced constantly.
To be honest a good chunk of it is also interpretation. It is difficult to see something like "has energy" and meaningfully conclude what that actually means. Internal terminology or leaked keywords can often be leveraged in different than expected ways.
It's always good to keep a skeptical eye on anything coming from datamining, not because it is right or wrong but difficult to interpret and often out of explicit context. (And sometimes we do just change our designs!)