You actually just trying to be a dick? You know what he was saying
I didn't at the time - this was right after the update and I hadn't seen that the spell icons moved even when no filters were being used. Coldfix is coming in 60 seconds.
You actually just trying to be a dick? You know what he was saying
I didn't at the time - this was right after the update and I hadn't seen that the spell icons moved even when no filters were being used. Coldfix is coming in 60 seconds.
I still don't have my rune pouch but plan to buy an emblem soon, does this mean I just need a Tier 1 emblem in my inventory before buying a tier 7 drop, otherwise no emblem will drop? Or do I also need a tier 7?
You will need an emblem in your inventory, a T1 will work.
Do you have a link to his/her twitter?
They don't have a Twitter just yet but are considering it.
This spell book update destroyed the ability to Alch/Stun efficiently. All the spots are now off please fix.
A coldfix is being worked on.
Regardless of your stated intentions, that is exactly how it looks. You repolled it TWICE then accepted the negative result despite it failing by only 1% when many fewer people voted. If you are going to repoll something, it should need like 30% of the vote to fail at the very least.
I don't think moving the goal posts for re-polls would be accepted. But we can commit to making them as visible as possible going forward. However, it is expected that fewer people will vote on the same thing each time.
Hold up, I have to risk an emblem to get one, but if the enemy doesn't have one I'm risking one for no reason at all? Who the hell thought this was a good idea
If the enemy is your target and you're risking an emblem, you still have the chance to generate one when you kill them even if they have none in their inventory. That has not changed.
High alch spell no longer overlays inventory slot, making alching difficult. This needs to be fixed
We're working on a coldfix that will put the spells back in their original positions.
Read moreWanted to share my opinion on the spell icon resizability.
The danger with repolling is lower engagement/participation. I think it’s slightly flawed that a poll with fewer votes can completely nullify a poll result that had more people engage in it.
While, yes, that’s up to people actually heading to the poll booths, I think it is your job to advertise the fact that something is being repolled (once again).
That’s where I think things could have gone better as you didn’t only post a picture of the poll failing at the time (someone paying attention would quickly point out that the poll didn’t have a lot of total votes at the time, but this was still completely unnecessary and I haven’t seen you do this before). You also posted and opened this on Thanksgiving, a popular holiday. And you closed it on a Wednesday, before the Q&A. Usually you briefly mention polls in the Q&A to remind people to vote (which again, is crucial for REPOLLS).
What I’m saying...
We hear you. Internal discussion and mixed ideas on how to poll the spellbook rework resulted in the first poll not being exactly what we would have liked. The second was not worded clearly, resulting in non-representative results, hence a third poll. It was never intended to get a certain result, which many here seem to suspect - regardless of our personal opinions, we want the game to reflect the overall playerbases' wishes. In terms of the re-poll getting enough visibility, I agree that it's essential this happens so that a minority vote overpowers a previous majority vote.
Can we get an option for old spellbooks? I actually don't like the filters and have to relearn my muscle memory...
You can use the filters to show every type of spell and leave them all on :)
Who's Mod Nasty? Their name has been included in the newsposts since the start of November.
Mod Nasty is our Data Analyst!
Honestly not happy with these changes. I don't like changing the oldschool mechanics of the game. Spec tabbing is shite for sure, but I feel as if it could have been addressed differently. Having an emblem in invent also seems a bit naff, but I don't BH much.
How would you prefer we addressed spec-tabbing?
is the collection log ever going to come out?
Hopefully early December!
Just got 99 hunter and I'm seeing an average of about 2.5 nests per house....
That’s the exact expected amount at 99
f**k yourself
Charming.
I think you might have goofed something then, I just did a run, got 4 nests as well with the magic birdhouses. My clan is saying similar things for magic birdhouses.
We'll keep an eye on it but after double checking, there's no sign Magic houses specifically are bugged. Remember that you're a small sample and Magic houses are one of the most used.
Since we don't get to vote on Integrity issues, can we have some sort of ability to revisit these issues in 2 weeks or a month?
Like, see how much nests are worth, how many people do birdhouses now, how the reduction of birdhouses may impact tree seed prices leading up to Kebos, so on?
Yep - we'll monitor the changes and the effect they have to inform us of any necessary tweaking.
I'll do another one later, but if possible I'd like to see how the drop rates are calculated. It just sounds like either bad rng or the formula for magic bird houses is unbalanced.
It scales almost perfectly evenly. I'll look to get you all the exact scaling soon!
Don't forget about me pls </3
I won't! I asked Ash to double check the Magic bird house code specifically and there's nothing peculiar - still sounds like bad RNG.
I'm consistently getting under 3 nests at 79 hunter with magic houses.
There's nothing specific to do with the code referring to Magic bird houses that would indicate there's a bug or that they behave differently. Sounds like bad RNG.