devtrackers.gg
It's me sitting way back with my spotting scope on ya.
It's me sitting way back with my spotting scope on ya.
He's the leader of the Ferengi tooth sharpening consortium and he's advertising his wares
This might be one of the best comments I've read on here.
Support was the best class in BF1.
Followed by Scout.
Then Medic.
We Assault disagree!
Disagree. What if I want to connect to a EU server so I can come take your tags? I wouldn't be able to. :(
You are a villain... did you also recommend update 5.2 you mad man?!?!
Ick no.
While we thank you and appreciate you making this post, we would rather bring focus to the previous post, along with its links and hotlines.
Thanks.
[removed]
Cya
I'll admit Ive actually been trolling people lately. I switch to the spotting scope from time to time and just keep it on one person. Its hilarious to watch them looking up in the sky, running around, trying to figure out whats going on.
Now to clarify, this has been going on for years. It’s most severe with BFV and I’m done. I have not found any way to fix this. I have been in touch with my ISP on several occasions and they tell me there isn’t anything they can do. Plus, this is exclusive to DICE made games such as Battlefront as well as older BF games. I’m confident it’s not on my end as if it were, all of my games would be affected, but they are not.
PC or no?
Wouldn’t that be Sholomon Islandsh?
It is with great sorrow and grief in which we make this announcement.
We have lost a long time Reddit moderator and friend.
/u/Falconbox, has passed away. ( https://twitter.com/_Falconbox )
A man who simply loved gaming, and giving back to the communities which gave him so much joy, Falconbox was a moderator with Reddit for over 6 years. He volunteered countless hours to help build, structure, and run subreddits such as r/XboxOne, r/PS4, r/PS5, r/Battlefield_One, r/BattlefieldV, and more.
You will be greatly missed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------...
Read more External link →You posted a damage chart. The patch notes don't specify if they're talking about damage over range, or range as in how far the bullets can actually go. We won't really know until we can see into the data browser.
Regardless, AA HMGs are only featured on Pacific tanks, and there are no bombers in the Pacific.
I posted a damage OVER DISTANCE chart. Bottom line is they are buffing the AA max range. Higher range = lower damage dropoffs. Anyhow, I give up trying to explain this to you.
You posted a chart from the 5.2 update in December where they nerfed the AA HMG damage? What does that have to do with what we were talking about?
Read the full patch notes. I posted 5x to show the old range. It's max range has been increased.
They aren't buffing the AA distance. They appear to only be standardizing the range of the HMGs/coax machine guns.
Directly buffing the distance.
You don’t even know what you’re talking about...they’re not buffing AA distance
Right, so like I originally said, the buffed the AA. Don't know why everyone disagreed lol.
You don’t even know what you’re talking about...they’re not buffing AA distance
What does this mean then?
Increased the range of the AA
Do you think the game uses a random number generator to create projectile values for AAs or something? Like what are you even talking about?
What I'm talking about is not debating if values are static in the game, of course they are. I am debating your reply to my statement of "Even if you hit a plane max distance, put every single shot on point as they fly towards you, you still dont kill them." saying its is certifiably untrue. Because it is absolutely true (for bombers). There was a lot of discussion and multiple videos proving this, just a week or two ago. Why do you think they are buffing the AA distance? Its a direct reaction to my statement.
You can absolutely certify whether or not certain things can happen in the game. Such as whether or not an AA hitting a plane from max range can kill it or not.
However, with fighters perhaps, but not untrue for bombers in the least.
Bombers are more resistant to ground attack, yes. But they're also the slowest and largest targets in the air, and therefore easiest to hit with things (hell, even tank shots can hit bombers pretty easily). And that's all ignoring the fact that bombers are extremely vulnerable to fighters.
You can absolutely certify whether or not certain things can happen in the game.
Ok, show me the certifications?
>I can tell you fly 😉
What is this supposed to mean?Why would you want to take out a european fighter from ground in the first place? they can't really do much to infantry and you should use another fighter to deal with them.
For Pacific bombers, as I already said the problem is in their balance not in the AA guns. They sould not have agility+ big bombs
So if in an average round 2-5 pilots get a combined 100-300 kills, and you MAYBE see 1-2 AA kills per round at most, it's not an AA related issue? Its strictly a bomber issue?
AA vs Planes has certainly been an ongoing balance issue in every single Battlefield. At least we dont have lock-ons though!
