Guys, we are diverting massively from the subject matter and point of this topic. There are other places where you can leave feedback for the patch, this is for discussing rumours and upcoming elements.
Guys, we are diverting massively from the subject matter and point of this topic. There are other places where you can leave feedback for the patch, this is for discussing rumours and upcoming elements.
Its set soon. How soon we cant say.
We have continued to tweak and improve repair costs this year with many important changes such as the reduction of event vehicles and focused on many other key areas of concern for the community. Next year we will continue to do so. But that is not the subject of this topic, so if you want to keep discussing it, take it to the economy feedback please.
Pretty much this stage. There are always some vehicles that are questionable, but everything that was certain to come is in the patch now and those that were not will be in the next update.
A full list of changes and bugfixes are published in the release patchnotes
Economy feedback is important so we can cross check all the figures and numbers and see if there are any major anomalies or black holes. Vehicles where both player feedback and the data agree.
In the cases, such as the one you speak of, most (speaking broadly here) French tanks earn more, stay alive longer in battle and have higher efficiencies than many other nations tanks. Thus as a result, have a higher repair cost. Feedback cannot be used as the only measure of adjustment, especially in cases where some players feedback say one thing and then the facts of reality are entirely different.
Not all feedback can be implemented, especially when the data shows a very different picture.
But again, this is not an economy discussion topic. So if you want to discuss it, you can use that topic.
From this point forward, economy related posts that belong in the correct topic will be removed from the thread as they should be in the correct place. We have warned about it enough times.
Please re-read what I wrote again. Mirage IIIC is, factually still one of (not
the
best, but one of) the best aircraft which you admitted yourself in your own post. The fact that it can and does perform so well against F-4E and MiG-21Bis shows how effective the aircraft is even without Flares and RWR.
Now this has nothing to do with the subject of this topic, once again
We have a Mirage topic and this can be discussed there.
Off topic posts again removed.
Again @SilverSho0t, we have a dedicated feedback topic for economics. If you want to leave feedback, do so there and do not just keep ignoring warnings that you have clearly seen and continuously keep derailing this topic.
I had already previously warned that any further posts off topic would be removed and warnings will start to be issued.
Yes there is. It's just a typo in the blog text.
Of the 40 valid bug reports made and forwarded, 35 have been fixed with only 5 remain as they are either historical matters requiring further validation or more complicated matters that need more time.
I have my bingo card ready. I think im probably gonna win within the first 50-100 pages for sure.
That is one of the ones requiring more review. As supposedly, it was only on more modern variants than the CBT.
Not quite certain this patch will have a box (as its a smaller one), but we shall see.
Only this one since it needs a bit more source review:
If your speaking about the wrong type of bomb (1000lb) then no, but thats not an issue with the Buccaneer. That was an existing issue with that series of British bombs on post-war aircraft.
Lets certainly hope everyone has a much better 2021
Orly? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
)))))
The tracks were not hot enough so we had to shove them back in the microwave for a bit.
Yes, all articles have now been corrected with the right info from the developers: https://warthunder.com/en/news/6999-development-mig-21-pfm-en
MiG-21PFM will have the R-3S for Air-to-air, which is the most advance missile it had in Soviet service.
Other missiles such as R-13M and R-60 that were shown on the test server (whilst the aircraft was still very much WIP) were only present on Foreign export models and not on Soviet examples.
Im not sure why you think its my job to "explain" anything like this.
Weapon choice selection is entirely down to the developers discretion. It has nothing to do with me or any Community Manger.
This would need proper sourcing and a historical report here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1957-weapons-and-ordnance/