Smin1080p

Smin1080p



18 Jun

Comment

There are no other missiles to be added for the 2000-5F other than MICA. Which as previously explained, are too advanced.


We dont simply just add range or speed to missiles to balance them. They are all configured historically.


Changes are made based on evidence from reports. So if its suspected to be incorrect, it can be reported and then investigated.



Stormshadow is a long range cruise missile. Such weapons are not planned anytime soon for any aircraft.



Please submit any valid evidence you have of it being incorrect if you suspect it is. Currently we have no forwarded reports on this. So its not being investigated.


17 Jun

Comment

Magic 2 currently has one of the highest flare resistances in game. So far, no sources have been submitted to show that it should be more / less.



Players have been asking for the Python 3 since the release of the Kfir and since the J-8 came and have had to wait all this time for it. So to be clear, the addition of Python 3 / PL-8 was not because some people had to "cry one day". The missiles have been requested and planned for over a year.



Both missiles for the MiG-23M and MiG-29 were already prepared and ready in case of balancing concerns / feedback. They were indeed added mid patche because they were ready to go.


There is no such missile to introduce for the Mirage 2000-5F. The MICA family is too advanced for the game currently and will not be coming anytime soon in the current plans.


16 Jun

Comment

The issues and reports on the Super 530D and Magic are separate from the aircraft itself. They each require further review, investigation and confirmation of the materials to ensure they are properly correct and implemented. Some of which you mentioned were only reported a week ago (Magic roll) and require further study and source confirmation. So there was no possibility of them being implemented so quickly.


Regarding the Mirage 2000C-S5, it too was regularly worked on. We now only have 2 reports open regarding that aircraft at this time. All others have been fixed or resolved. Many were done before its release and the rest in the weeks and months after. The same can be said for the Mirage 2000-5F. 18 were resolved to this point, with just the 6 I mentioned above outstanding.

Comment

The MiG-29 blog was in response to feedback from the wider community regarding concerns and issues with the aircraft. This was also due to what was prepared and known in terms of internal tests with the R-27ER missile before the aircraft even released.


Currently, we have a total of 6 forwarded reports open on the Mirage 2000-5F. All of which are being investigated.


Regarding the report "RDY radar has missing air to air and air to ground modes", the developers have already added Velocity search mode. Other modes are not so useful or are too complex for the current radar implementation in the game. As such, its possible they may be expanded in the future.


As we have already previously mentioned, the suggestion to include a HMS is being reviewed. Similarly, the matter of the CM dispenser model is under review.


For battle rating, there has not been s...

Read more
Comment

Hello


Please be sure to report any suspected issues with your evidence here: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder


We can then review them for investigation.

Comment

Hey.


At the moment we don't have any news on the return of this series. Its not something currently planned in the close future.


14 Jun

Comment

Hello. We urgently need the Client replay and clog files from any session where this occurred please. Sadly without them the issue cannot be properly located.


https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder

Comment

Please be sure to report any crashes or issues here with your files: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder


We need these in order to correctly track, trace and resolve the issue.


Thanks!

Comment

Other vehicle suggestions for future Swedish Squadron vehicles are more than welcome. Regarding the CV90105, it was replaced in the way it was in order to retain its stabilizer. The existing vehicle had a stabilizer that was not historically accurate. The changeover to the new model allowed it to simply retain the stabilizer.


We don't currently have any plans to remove the T-80U however as its an entirely optional vehicle to obtain and use. For much the same reason, it wont be directly replaced with another vehicle for those that own it. Other squadron vehicles may be added in the future.

Comment

All of the tree movements have currently been paused as part of the overall planned changes announced yesterday.

Comment

As always guys, please be sure to leave your feedback on the update in the official topic:


@TheElite96will post the roundup of this topic and the next one later on


But for now:


13 Jun

Comment

La Royale will be with us tomorrow

Post

Dear players!




On June 14th, from 08:00 GMT, the War Thunder game servers may be unavailable due to the release of the “La Royale” major update. While your client is being downloaded, read the devblogs.




We apologize for any inconvenience experienced.

Comment

You were not contacted as you made it clear you wished to remove the information in the OP and intended to post your topic on another platform. Again, we fully respect any decision you wish to make with your own post. But restoring the rest of the topic and everyone else's posts is not something we need to consult you for.


If you do wish to update and restore your OP, it can be restored at any point without an issue.


Up until now, we are simply respecting your own wish to remove the info of the OP but restoring the rest of the topic for everyone else. Once you have decided if you do / don't wish for the OP to be restored, that can be done. But this thread itself can carry on in the meantime for others without being connected to other issues you have with other aspects of the game / forum.

Comment

Your wish was to remove / censor the information from the OP.


We have respected that wish, but the remaining contents, subsequent discussion and also developer responses are not something your consent is required for as you do not have ownership over all of those posts by others.


The original posts have not been deleted and can be restored at any time. However your wish was to censor them and have the information removed and post to another platform. As mentioned, your wish has been respected here, but the remaining users of the threads are entirely just as entitled to have their posts back.


Respectfully we understand you disagree with certain things and this is not about that. We have respected your wish to remove that information from these topics whilst keeping them here for others to use and discuss.


12 Jun

Comment

Hi guys


Due to community requests from users who wished for the main bulk of discussions and responses from this thread, as well as the many developer answers within them, we have restored the topic as best possible in order to comply with the original poster of the previous topics wishes to remove their opening post information to share on another platform.


We hope the restoration of the thread in this way is the best solution for everyone in order to retain as much of the many discussions that took place here whilst respecting the previous OPs wishes also to remove their main post.

Comment

Hi guys


Due to community requests from users who wished for the main bulk of discussions and responses from this thread, as well as the many developer answers within them, we have restored the topic as best possible in order to comply with the original poster of the previous topics wishes to remove their opening post information to share on another platform.


We hope the restoration of the thread in this way is the best solution for everyone in order to retain as much of the many discussions that took place here whilst respecting the previous OPs wishes also to remove their main post.

Comment

Currently it does not have one, but a report has already been submitted and is under review.

Comment

Queue times is not a primary reason for a BR change. The vehciles balance is.

Comment

Not every vehcile in every update gets a blog. Not even every new top jet (See Tornado F.3 last update and others in the past.


We have also had multiple French blogs this patch, even one today too. So this has nothing to do with it being French.