Smin1080p

Smin1080p


Yesterday

Comment

That's because is not a developers job to communicate. They are busy developing and working on the game. They answer everything they can through us as it's our job (community management and staff) to pass it along. On top of this, we have Q&As with BVV virtually every month on the website and Dev blogs every update.


Back in the days of a much smaller community, we used to be able to have a developer on the forum and answer a small topic. But it grew to the point where every one answer spawned 50 more questions and it would eventually take more than a week for developers to fully answer a full topic and all the questions within.


This isn't viable anymore. They are busy people with lots to do. But we have expanded communication everywhere else.


24 Nov

Comment

No its fine, but this isn't really the place to discuss it. We are open to suggestions and feedback. Feel free to PM me if you have any more ideas you want to put forward.

Comment

Unfortunately not. Since it also contains internal matters and NDA covered content.

Comment

We have explored other methods and really no ideal solution that worked (as in from an internal Tech - Dev perspective, as well as Player - Tech) as well as we would have liked.


But we are always looking for new options.

Comment

No. This is a pure conspiracy theory and I have no idea why we have really dropped to these levels of superstition.


The developers are investigating reports, but right now no direct cause is showing itself.

Comment

And if you followed the link, to the correct topic rather than continuously taking this one off topic, you would see my response there

Comment

I dont know when this became "when will X be fixed" roundup topic, but this sort of thing is really not the main substance of this thread.


If you want updates to specific reports, you can PM myself or any Tech Mod with the link to the report. But we cannot give ETAs most of the time, especially to things that are not actually "bugs" but historical matters.



I also do not see any bug report from you on this matter. So perhaps thats the best place to start, rather than the rumor roundup topic for the next major.

Comment

As far as I understand, the developers are already working on it. We cannot give it any more priority than that.

Comment

The developers have responded on this matter. This is not an error. If it was a British tank, it would have had British ammunition. But the tank was built in one copy and was eventually promoted for the export market. It was not adopted by British armed forces.

Comment

Most things correctly reported with valid sources have been fixed. There are a some outstanding ones under review and some that were closed due to a total lack of viable source material or sources actually with substantial evidence. So really I dont know what you referring too here as thats such an open ended question as to what your asking will be "fixed".


Regardless, this is not the topic for the Challenger. We have one here:

Comment

Unfortunately its not just as easy as sending a person with a sound recorder and just telling them to go record a CR2.


For one, they are not exactly the most easily accessible tanks. Indeed they are often present at tankfest and some other public events, but thats not exactly idea conditions for sound recording, nor is there any guarantee the crew are able to even perform all of the necessary actions and movements that are required to capture all the sounds for the game. Sound recording takes a whole team of people, often a full day or more, requirements for full access to the vehicle (often sound is recorded inside and out) and full co-operation with the crew and owners of the machine. Not only this, but Challenger is one tank out of hundreds that could have unique sounds too.


You can see examples of what it actually takes here:

Comment

Shimakaze was added only 2 months ago in September.


We also never said we stopped at all. People just assume after every few months we have stopped when we never said to expect new ones in just under 2 months. They are added periodically.


And yes. There will be a new one in the near future.

Comment

Given we only just raised its BR a few days ago, more time is needed to analyse how it's doing at 9.7 now.

Comment

As tempting as it is to deny things already mentioned and crush the dreams, we are not going to do it just yet )))


23 Nov

Comment

I hate to tell you this, but we are not using that list as a benchmark for UK (or any nations) aircraft to add. There are examples spanning all 3 decades you mentioned still to come.


That list is a drastically oversimplified representation of those eras of aviation and what's in them.


Again, not everything is going to be a top meta fighter but thats the same with every nation.

Comment

I think you may be thinking wrong then. Even outside of variants, the UK has lots of examples.


Every major this year for example has had one


Also not everything is going to be a number 1 air-to-air competitor whenever its added. Different planes have different roles.

Comment

Nobody said this. What we said was, ASA is all Italy have until much later generation aircraft. We are not in any rush to add it, for one because it is more advanced over the current F-104S but more importantly because then Italy has nothing for an extremely long time in the fighter department.



Again, removing a loadout from an aircraft is a secondary priority and really not important to the game overall. We do indeed deal with historical matters over time but they are a much lower priority than actual game bugs.


There is no connection between the F-104S having a gun with Sparrows and the ASA not coming soon. There is no link there.

Comment

We have a report under investigation that will be dealt with when there is time to do so, but in the grand scheme of things, removing the gun from the F-104S and effectively making it worse is not exactly a priority when there are actual game bugs, that stop people from even playing or effect gameplay experiences that the developers consider higher priority.


Calling the F-104S "fiction" is an entirely dramatic overstatement thats way off course. It has a gun that some sources suggest it cant also use at the same time as Sparrows are mounted. If thats the case, when the developers reach the report, they will likely remove it. But the aircraft is not "fiction" and if it really bothers you that much, simply dont mount Sparrows for now


Naturally as a game, stability, functionality and balance are at the core first. But we are also a historical game and dont just make up or invent fake or non-existent vehicles just ...

Read more
Comment

We cannot say anything just yet and we dont want to raise expectations just to have disappointment. So its best to wait until a closer time and more offical news.




devtrackers.gg