Smin1080p

Smin1080p


Comment

We do not release the full details of our statistics. They are a combination of multiple key factors.

Comment

The ASA is a later modification and the version of the F-104S to carry AIM-9L. Not the early S or TAF.


As mentioned, this is not under consideration as the ASA is 11.3 with 4 x AIM-9L. The 104S has 6 x AIM-9J and is at 11.0.


The F-104S moved to 11.0 because of its high efficiency at 10.7. So its also not going to receive even better missiles on the back of that.

Comment

This is not under consideration. The F-104S.ASA has AIM-9L at 11.3.

Comment

No further changes are planned at this time. Again, the aircraft had the highest efficiency at 10.7, so it could not remain there. It's been at 11.0 for just one week. As I mentioned, the Devs will follow it's status and make changes if necessary in a future BR review update.

Comment

As far as I'm aware, if it was a basic option, it would have been done already. So likely requires more work from our web Devs than is actually worth it.


Really not that big of an issue and very clear in the rules just not to use it. Much like everyone has a caps lock, but it's not a reason to write in all caps all the time.


Regardless, this really has nothing to do with the topic at this stage.

Comment

Simply part of the forum tools.

Comment

No red text is to be used. There is no "official" one.


1.1.9.
Use red text font in any respect. This is reserved for
staff use to highlight problems or statements.

Comment

9/10 times someone has already asked them before, so we have the response already because we already know. If not, we will ask if it's something we need to cover.

Comment

CV-90s never had that form of tracking. They have a more rudimentary system that's also found on most MBTs for basic target tracking. It's still being decided if / how this form of tracking will be implemented. But it won't be like IRST lock.


For HSTV-L, we are still looking into the details.


We are looking into such systems, but again, no plans to speak of right now.


Yesterday

Comment

Forwarded to the developers for review. Thanks for your report.

Comment

You did not read at all what I said:


Once again you provided no proof this document is fully declassified or unrestricted.


These rules are not something to just ignore and skip over. This is a serious matter and we will handle it as such.


We will not handle any documents or allow any documents on the forum that may be of a sensitive or classified nature. Proof of declassification and proof of no restrictions is required.


01 Feb

Comment

@SlowHandClap



Post Removed



Do not
post any material or manuals without proof of declassification / export restriction etc:

No, being available online does not mean it is automatically. If its newer than 30 years, it requires clear proof. Even if something is older, it needs to be checked for export restriction.

Comment

Hello


Firstly, please do not write in all caps lock. There simply is not a need for that.


Secondly, the dev server comes after the development stream for any major update. Since we haven't even had a single dev blog for the next major update, you can assume we are still some time away from the next dev server. We announce them clearly in the forum news section when they come.

Comment

Beyond our Mobile Game, War Thunder Edge, we do not have any plans currently for a "second" version of War Thunder. We will continue to update and support the game as always with new content, features and updates.

Comment

To answer your first question:


For your second, likely not as a video, but stay tuned to the news

Comment

We don't rule out the possibility of it, however every new control added brings its own limitations and restrictions (particularly for console players). So we have to give every new addition a lot of thought first.

Comment

There were no previously passed or forwarded reports on this matter before this one that I can see. So wherever they were being "reported" it was not via the correct means or likely not sufficient information.


This was the first valid report on the matter. So your claim about it being reported years ago is incorrect. It was correctly reported 3 months ago and now fixed.



We are always working to improve any FMs and make any positive changes wherever possible based on reports or our own internal developments.


But currently we don't have any spesific news to provide on FBW control.

Comment

It was reported 3 months ago, not years. As you can see by the report linked.


31 Jan

Comment

The only open flap issue is this one: