Bug reports are necessary for proper traceability and reporting. If all the info is present for whats required for a bug report, then it will be very easy for it to be properly reported, as it should be rather than a discussion topic. When a report is made, we can forward that for review.
Please in future do not simply copy / paste an entire forum discussion topic word for word, even down to the title without any correct formatting or attempts to make it into a bug report. We have accepted the report, but please do not submit reports in this way in the future.
The lack of any combined loadouts is simply down to initial configurations on dev servers. The same is true for the A-10 and several other aircraft.
The radar report has now been resolved. As far as im aware, that's all F-104S ASA reports dealt with.
The suggestion report to add S X AGM-12B will be treated purely as a suggestion and subject to further developer review and consideration. At the moment, there hasn't been any evidence it was used other than the manual and some Greek F-104S/Gs. So any additional sources would be welcome for the ASA.
Chinese G does not really help the case of the Italian ASA.
Final loadout configurations are not yet complete due to ongoing changes. (if your going by that recent datamine)
We consulted with a pilot of the F-104S ASA. The aircraft apparently never used the AGM-12, the c*ckpit of the 104S ASA was not equipped to use the AGM-12.
We have this, devs decided based on the Pilot correspondence and lack of further evidence that it was ever used on the ASA.
We don't only go off of interviews. However in this case there is very little evidence it was something even tested on the ASA and a pilot also clarified it was never used in the ASA. Its still under review none the less. But addional info would be needed as it's currently looking like just a copied section from the F-104G in some cases.
Devs are taking a look.
RWR has had a full report raised and forwarded. Radar getting "stuck" in some positions, we have had some clips that have been forwarded, but a full report on the community tracker site would also be useful for everyone to also benifit: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder
Acknowledged thanks: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/aAUSUqwtdlFV
The report is currently still open, however it appears the F-104S ASA may not have actually had directional RWR. It had the AN/ALQ-73 radar receiver, which only warns of radar signals, but based on our current information, it does not actually provide any directional indication of the signal. We are waiting on an update from the developers on the matter.
We dont have any ECM features of this nature in game yet, but they are not ruled out for the future as new additions and for existing aircraft.
If you believe any other aircraft didn't also have directional RWR, then please simply report it and they will be changed. Earlier models of F-104 had a indipendent RWR package that the ASA did not have as it's RWR functionality was part of its ECM suite.
I'm not trying to "pull" anything. This is the current understanding from the developers based on the capabilities of the aircraft. If you have information to counter that, then please submit it and we can forward it for review.
All of them are G family members of which this was possible to fit / was fitted. At least according to the Devs current info. But again, we welcome reports with counter information if you think it's incorrect.
As far as I'm aware all weaponry changes (including the addition or removal of any guns) does indeed change the weight.
Devs are aware of it.
All radars follow their historical data. If you believe one is incorrect, you can report it with the appropriate documentation.
devtrackers.gg