I would apricate if you would avoid accusations of me lying directly to you all or at the very least accusations of me purposefully misleading people please. I fully respect your personal opinion, but we are speaking about something I am directly responsible for here and its not my job to lie about anything within bug reporting.
Bug Reports in general have seen a surge in frequency since the Starfighters update. All areas, from Ground Forces, to Aviation, To general gameplay to Console areas have seen a general slowdown in response time due to the volume of reports, all of which need to be reviewed and dealt with even if they are spam / non-reports or anything else that clutters the system. We will soon be recruiting more Technical Moderators to help with this, but it has effected ALL areas of the bug reporting system, not just Naval.
Im also not simply putting something on paper:
I am directly responsible for all Technical Moderators and manage the section. If there was any change in direction or approach to bug reports, it would have to come from me or through me and I can assure you there has been no such change in the approach to Naval Reports.
The only changes to the system of any kind were communicated very clearly after the Starfighters update and we have been very transparent about the changes made and issues faced both pre and post those changes:
Now if someone where to share this supposed "insider" Technical Moderator conversation thats being both accused here and also used as a means to justify a conformation bias, then I will gladly peruse and answer any matters of it personally until its resolved fully. But right now we are going on made up stores and theories.