Rounds are issued at the discretion of the developers. Vehicles may not always have every shell available too them as they can sometimes be added later if required for balancing. Currently its intended for this vehicle to not have FAPDS.
As for any other issues, please submit a report, and we can pass them on for review.
Please submit a report and pass me the link.
The site works correctly, there is simply a high number of spam / non reports.
No updates currently.
More reports are being forwarded than ever before. As I said, simply make a report and if you don't get a response within the standard timeframe, let one of us know.
Up to a month was generally what we had on the forum. As I said, its not always possible to uphold that on the CBR platform, so if something has been up longer than that, contact a mod.
Please just PM myself or any Tech Mod. No need to derail topics over unrelated reports.
The report itself would be updated directly if there was a change.
Hey
Sadly we cant use crew statements/tweets as sources. If that was the case, a lot of undocumented and unsupported (source wise) changes would be taking place.
A list of useable sources can be found here:
Belt composition and final shell choices are indeed a balance decision, however they are still based on whatever rounds were connected / available / could be fired from the tank in question. So a source based element is still needed to instigate the change. Yes, a suggestion is entirely fine for this. But again, the crew statement would need to be properly supported.
Im not really sure what point you are trying to make here. As I said, we construct belts with regards to two factors. A) Historical / Sourced based consideration as to what shells were available for the gun / vehicle and B) Balance considerations. Even if something is a prototype, its possible to find details on its guns, possible ammunition and from that construct belts from the sources and materials that are avalable.
The question asked to me was if a crew statement was sufficient to report something. As far as our reporting standards go, no, as explained crew statements are not sufficient by themselves. Claims and statements are made all the time about vehicles from crew that differ from well established sources, so sadly, we cant accept them.
Perhaps im misunderstanding, but the question asked was was the crew statement sufficient. As a general rule the devs do not accept crew statements for any kind of game changes really unless there is further supporting evidence.
If there is viable means to show the shell was possible / used for the gun via source material, then its indeed possible to be submitted for consideration at least.
A source wont change a balance decision. That's indeed correct.
My answer previously was about acceptable sources. Crew statements are not one of them.
Shell / belt composition is and always will be down to the devs to ultimately decide. However we can pass on for consideration suggestions supported by materials (sources). It may not change the outcome, but its something we can do in terms of feedback
If you can link the references we can pass them on for consideration, before you purchase anything or make any detailed contacts just to raise the idea again and check if its still a balancing factor.
devtrackers.gg