[2022] Planned Battle Rating changes, September 2022

We continue to monitor the Battle Ratings of vehicles and their competitive capabilities. Below you will find a list of the changes we want to make in September 2022.

To open the Battle Rating changes list in a new tab, click here!

If you think we should make some additional changes or do not agree with listed changes, please support your suggestions with arguments!

We read all your feedback, so it can take some time to approve your post. Please be sure to stay on topic.

Thanks!

You can leave your feedback in this thread

We continue to monitor the Battle Ratings of vehicles and their competitive capabilities. Below you will find a list of the changes we want to make in September 2022.

To open the Battle Rating changes list in a new tab, click here!

If you think we should make some additional changes or do not agree with listed changes, please support your suggestions with arguments!

We read all your feedback, so it can take some time to approve your post. Please be sure to stay on topic.

Thanks!

F-104S ASA isn't missing any AIM-9Ls. It could only carry a maximum of 4. The underside rails couldn't be used for AIM-9L.

As always, if you think you have information that shows otherwise, a historical report is welcome.

AIM-9J was never used by the ASA. They were given to the G and S based on use on both of those aircraft in other European countries and for balance purposes as they were at the time the only top tiers of Italy.

The ASA now has AIM-9L, which is what it actually used. If you can find an example of an ASA using AIM-9J in service with another nation or tested with it, then it can be reported under historical reports and submitted for consideration.

Thank you all for your feedback.

We have now passed on all feedback for the devs to review