An overview of what has been done and what is planned to be done. Read it on the portal
It is not mentioned, because the details of the company's internal processes, or the relationships of individual staff members, are not for public consumption. I've been here for 10 years and have been through every seniority level. In that time I have seen many people come and go, for various reasons both personal and professional (including disciplinary).
We certainly have our fair share of organizational problems, just like all big companies do. However, I'd take personal internet testimonies with a grain of salt and be wary of what you extrapolate from them, because they are reflective of someone's feelings and opinions on a topic or problem, but usually don't show trajectories - i.e. how that topic is being or has been addressed.
Please don't expect us to have dialogue with the community on internal topics not directly connected to the development of World of Warships.
Thank you for sharing your opinion. Your proposed solution is certainly a possibility, though an extreme one. We'll make that decision based on the results of this and future testing stages. However, I would just like to challenge the majority argument you put forward, because the majority community opinion is not defined by posts on community channels (as these as populated by a minority of the active player base), but by the data and survey responses gathered from people who have participated in testing.
Sending winback emails is standard industry practice, so you're sure to get one eventually. Bye!
Today, we're going to tell you about the changes and improvements we have made. Read it on the portal
devtrackers.gg