Originally posted by Tweed: Comments off under official announcements
Official announcements aren't often meant to be discussion threads and when they are open people often post hoping to interact with the developers since, "Gosh, they were just here so they'll see my comment or question!". This can lead to a lot of disappointment and arguments when no answers come from official sources and instead there are a lot of flame answers given by random followers.
An announcement is just that: an announcement. If you want to talk about it then go to the actual forum threads to discuss. BTW, a far larger proportion of the comments in announcement threads is positive compared to the regular forum discussion threads so stifling negative comments is not the point of keeping an announcement locked as purely an announcement.
forum topics off/merged to (idk hide amount of negative opinions/feedback) this - maybe contact Steam and close whole forum/discussions section? Why bother creating "megathreads".
Merged threads and megathreads don't hide the amount of negative opinions since people (like you just now) can still post to the threads and voice their negative opinions. It does keep the forums organized and clean. People who want to read the negative comments can go to the place where they reside and not have to scroll through duplicate threads created by people who don't check to see if there is already a thread for their topic.
Also, the topic of how long this game has been in development isn't the only topic discussed by a long shot. It is supremely silly to call for the closure of the entire forum just because this one topic has been pinned as a megathread for all such discussion. I've seen this forum organization practice done on many forums so it definitely isn't something out of the ordinary
Btw this is great: "Predicting the game will never be finished Calling the game a scam Accusing the devs of abandoning or planning to abandon the game" - why don't set "better" rule - either you speak positively or dont speak at all.
Libel is not just an illegal activity in many countries but it is also immoral. The simple truth is that the game has not been abandoned nor will it be. Spreading lies that it has been dropped or soon will be by the developers is harmful to their reputation and business and will not be tolerated. You can speak negatively of the game and of how long it has been in development but stating that it will be abandoned or has been abandoned is quite simply a lie for the express purpose of harming the success of the game and its developers.
Once again, you are calling for a complete closure of any kind of critical discussion if you are to be limited in one specific way which is ridiculous.
What you can talk about from a negative slant:How long the game has been in development
How this game can still maintain the label of "Early Access" or "Alpha"
How the changes in gameplay have been handled over the past decade
What you miss that got cut.
How much longer you speculate it will take to finish
Why such a long development cycle has damaged the game's reception
Bugs that persist after years that you feel make the game unplayable
How other development studios are doing a better job with their early access games and why
What you can't talk about:The devs will or already have abandoned this game and it will never be completed.
See? There is still plenty to discuss and lots of negativity to be expressed without spreading libelous statements.