Hi, I'm reporting something that I saw in the game chat a lot when doing some map review : the review time (3 min) is often far too short, or at least not adapted.
If it's a 30s map, it's totally fine, almost too long because you can repeat the map a lot. But for any ~1 min map, not even talking about longer ones, 3 min is far too short when you're discovering it, and you can't really judge a map you finished once or twice. For example it a section necessitates a little bit of speed, chances are the first few times you won't even finish the map, so you can't really have an opinion on it.
Would it be possible to :
I love this map review feature, but it is often frustrating, either when you're discovering a map that's probably good but that you can't really finish properly, or when you're proposing one and you know people won't be able to know its real value.
Thanks for reading me, don't forget to like this post if you agree
If it's a 30s map, it's totally fine, almost too long because you can repeat the map a lot. But for any ~1 min map, not even talking about longer ones, 3 min is far too short when you're discovering it, and you can't really judge a map you finished once or twice. For example it a section necessitates a little bit of speed, chances are the first few times you won't even finish the map, so you can't really have an opinion on it.
Would it be possible to :
- Change the default time ? Maybe 4 min at least ?
- Adapt the time based on the author medal ? Like a multiple : 4 * author medal or something like that, maybe within a certain limit ;
- Maybe extend the time based on a players vote ?
I love this map review feature, but it is often frustrating, either when you're discovering a map that's probably good but that you can't really finish properly, or when you're proposing one and you know people won't be able to know its real value.
Thanks for reading me, don't forget to like this post if you agree