CCP_Rattati

We are aware of the potential for increase in ganking and will take measures. We are already mapping out our options.

Hi everyone, these changes are all in line with the stated goals of the EVE Ecosystem Segment, found here:

Happy to discuss and aggregate your feedback.

I would like that very much!

Not a bad analogy!

Thanks for the thoughtful feedback!

Exactly!

I would say that to do PVE such as Missions or Dungeons at length can be a grind in most MMO’s, but there is room for improvement on making the content a bit more dynamic and challenging.

Much appreciated and point taken!

The Ecosystem has lot of moving and interacting parts, and this high level outlook hopefully gives you a sense of what we think we need to focus on.

Absolutely, and there are some surprises around the corner!

We wanted to come out with a strong statement about the current state of affairs, that we recognize their are issues at hand our intent to fix them. Thanks for the support!

Thanks everyone for the feedback, a lot of good points here, and importantly, we have/had all of them identified on our list of opportunities for improvement.

We are looking forward and learning from the past, not lamenting or arguing over it.

Happy to try to clarify some specifics further, keeping in mind that we are being deliberately vague in some cases, to minimize speculation risk, and also because we have to be able to course correct based on each step of this journey.

Pretty much spot on with every point of your analysis.

We just chose to show a single graph, both FW (LP income) and mining (Ore income) are monitored.

There is no doubt that the impact of bots in the Market is invisible to most players and extremely harmful to normal traders.

We also monitor those activities, even if they are not in this particular graph.

this is the ISK faucet graph. We have other graphs and detection methods, that include mining.