over 3 years ago - Smin1080p - Direct link

Challenger 1 is not performing as badly as what TURMS was. Therefor it is not in need of L26.

over 3 years ago - Smin1080p - Direct link

The same way the Harrier was moved up to 9.7.


The developers can see the statistics for all vehicles, how well they do in battle and all of their metrics. T-72 TURMS was the lowest performer of its BR by a very large margin.



The situation that you describe and the reality of the facts that the statistics show don't align. The Challenges have always been preforming decently well for its BR.

over 3 years ago - Smin1080p - Direct link

It has nothing to do with "personal bias" as you claim. But factual data.


The developers can see the stats of all vehicles in game and thats how such decisions are made.


Challenger 1 is not at the bottom of its BR unlike the T-72 TURMS was, so the developers do not need or have to give it Challenger 2s L26 round.



A report has already been made if I remember correctly. We cannot raise its priority beyond what it already is.

over 3 years ago - Smin1080p - Direct link

This isn't how it works at all. My personal opinion has nothing to do with it. Please don't mislead people.

over 3 years ago - Smin1080p - Direct link

Please check your facts before misquoting me.


I was asked if a new Type 74 was coming in that patch (Raining Fire) specifically which it was not. I said nothing about future patches and never denied a new Type 74 variant for the next patch. We never answer about a following patch when a current one has not even been released.


So it seems you massively misunderstood the context of my answer and took the question out of line. I have not mislead anyone in that area.