Hearthstone Dev Tracker

Hi! Want to chime in here because I've been seeing more and more comments like this recently. Our outsourcing process for card art includes feedback from many qualified individuals (some of them also contributing card artists!) and significant iteration. We see these images being created from the sketch phase to the final product and everything in between. As someone else already said in the replies, the artists are credited on each card, and I encourage you to go check out their other work. :)

The Mini version is a Mech, looks like we just had an error on this asset. Whoops!

LEO WHY

YEAH ME TOO!

No waiting needed. It's solvable.

Veneers.

I said 11 instead of 12 decks and reposted for accuracy. Here's the new one.

https://twitter.com/SongbirdCora/status/1758195875317498090?t=5o8jWiso33WQRwVdESZ0_w&s=19

it is not meant to be dual-minion-type, it is intended to have no minion type

if you want the honest answer, it was a Mech/Beast for a while because the original idea of the card is a riff on one of those cymbal-clapping monkeys. it made sense at the time to make it Mech/Beast. but once we went through the art process, this became a Hozen (not Beasts), and the final art came back looking very not-mech-y. so, no minion type!

Mind Control will be changed to 9 mana

I fell for this at first too. Bravo.

🫡

I love you, Clay.

:o

Bacon was the codename for Battlegrounds during initial development.

ive been found out

Love to see it, ive been playing a similar list in Legend

Btw grats on Legend :)

Ahh so close

Neither card costs less, therefore nothing should be destroyed.

This is known and will be fixed in an upcoming patch!

The entire intent of "from the past" is to give access to cards not normally available in the format, so no, the current behavior is not intended.