Bualar

Please provide more details and some screenshots. You can DM me or reply here.

Aaaww, so sweeeet :3
Thank you all. I know there are times when you may feel frustrated or disappointed about updates or some other changes (I play games for 20+ years so trust me, I've been there and I've done that haha) but we always try our best to bring you most mindblowing experience!
Love y'all!

Shouldn't be. We didn't receive any complaints lately and it's working just fine for at least past ~7 hours.

And who will define it? :)
But anyway, we are not going to release it to randoms UNTIL it's a properly balanced to be playable and enjoyable. And IF there will be some balance or else issues we are ready to postpone it until it's good to go.

If it's not announced yet, then we are 100% are not going to announce it via a comment on the forum :)
You'll have to wait until the official announcement, it will be on the portal news section for sure.

We are not ready to share it now. But we will definitely post about it closer to the date of its release.

Yet another year has passed on our voyage, and we’ve been busy getting ready for the celebrations dedicated to World of Warship’s Fourth Anniversary!

Join the festive frenzy, and enjoy new Directives, Victory Bonuses, and an extraordinary new Port! So, what’s on offer in our celebratory Update?

A new discount coupon applicable to those Premium ships that can acquired for doubloons in the Armory


Two new Ranked Sprints


Clan Brawl in a 3 vs. 3 format


Further audio and graphic enhancements


And much more!

Anniversary!

As we pass the threshold of our fourth year, we'd like to mark the occasion by offering you an array of gifts and fresh in-game activities. The first win with each Tier X ship while Update 0.8.8 is live will bring you a supercontainer, and after successf...

Yes, but you have to make sure that the path to the replay file doesn't contain spaces.

Oh boy, that was too long ago, I don't remember either hahaha

It can be damaged with AP shells as well.

As I already said, I can understand people frustration and I clearly see your point of view on this after CV rework. However, we took that CV rework experience into account and subs will not go straight to randoms. It will be placed in a separate mode where players will be able to try it and we, developers, will be able to receive enough statistic data and feedback to calibrate it right in case of gameplay, balance, mechanics, etc.

Then try it later and let's see how it's going to work in an actual battle.

Comparing game changes with a hit by a bus is strange.
Just sayin'...

Because it's same as changing leading role actor in a movie based on social media negative responses. Weird, no? For example, everyone was totally negative after Warner Bros. told that Ben Affleck is gonna be new Batman. But in the end, he played his part pretty good and most ppl liked him in that role.
And one more good thing, movie does not have a test runs and we do :)

Because we definitely are not going to change anything based on feedback from an alpha video footage. And that's why we will have tests to receive a valuable feedback from players who actually played sub or VS. sub.

We are running more tests and subs will be placed in a separate mode and won't go straight to randoms as it was with CV.

You will learn that after tests. I'm myself haven't played the subs yet so I can't tell you exactly how it will be. But in theory... DD is the only class that can damage it while it's underwater, all other ships can damage it just fine with main battery while a sub is on periscope or surface levels. And since sub has a limitations for being periscope and underwater it can't hide for long it's forced to be on a surface level to regen.

I don't mind you to comment. But debating about game changes and how bad it's going to be is based on... nothing.
What exactly is broken? The speed? The circles? You may not like the mechanics but debating about "I already know how it will look in randoms" is kinda strange. As it was said numerous time, after tests it will be added in a separate mode for further tests, balancing, feedback gathering, etc.

That's why it will be in a separate mode. So we can balance and change it until it will be tenable.

As I told already, I don't mind criticizing the subs mechanics or else. But what I don't get is assumptions about how bad it's going to be in randoms after we add subs there. When it was clearly said that we are not going to put it in randoms right after tests. It will be in a separate mode for further balancing, etc.

It serves to show you how it will look in game but still, it may be changed since it's WiP. But what I saw now is a debate about how bad it's going to be in a late-game or how no one except DD can do something to Subs. Which is kinda meaningless and not true.

We are already collecting applications for Beta Test so it's going to be pretty soon. However, applying for it doesn't mean you will be able to participate since Beta test will have its limits.

CV rework was a hard process with its own nuances and we took that experience into account in our work on subs.

I can't consider any thoughts about something you barely saw in Alpha state as feedback. That's why I'm telling everyone to WAIT for the test. To TRY the subs and only THEN to leave feedback.

Judging upon an Alfa footage...

I told it numerous times in several threads already - wait for the tests to see how it will actually work in-game (and even then many things may be changed based on players feedback), debates that are based on WiP footage are meaningless.

DD the only class that can attack sub at underwater level with depth charges. On periscope and surface levels ANY ship can hit it with its main battery.

Ok so. Not applying history when it can break the game = bad. Applying history when it's possible to game to work = bad. So... does it even possible to make things good with such logic? Because if we won't apply history at all it will also be bad. And if we apply history everywhere the game will be unplayable...