Hapa_Fodder

Presentamos a los cruceros soviéticos Tallinn, Riga y Petropavlovsk; aprendan todo lo que necesitan saber para alcanzar la victoria. Leer en el portal

Introduzindo os cruzadores soviéticos Tallinn, Riga e Petropavlovsk—saiba tudo o que você precisa saber para alcançar a vitória! Leia no portal

So I just wanted to respond to you real quick, though our devs do not visit the forums as frequently as say, me. They DO visit the forums and DO read posts, they just typically let the NA staff respond to you all or gather that feedback. We DO gather all the feedback and actually have been about this particular topic as well.

Though we did not necessarily make a change in the fashion that some would want, we ARE exploring options and changes and testing things etc... which is what we do regularly.

At the end of the day, this is what this change coming up is, another test.

-Hapa

DANG IT YOU CAUGHT US!

-Hapa

We had a link to patch it yourself because the WGC wasn't required for EVERYONE as of yet and as a result not everyone had the issue, the WGC had not also been patched to the final product which will now be required. I have been using the WGC for years and have not had ANY of the issues that some have had. But I also do not run any mods, nor do I try to work around using the WGC.

-Hapa

This is purely to ensure that the game is running correctly, if there are crashes we are able to gather data on that crash to help us assist in client repair or even if you put a CS ticket in, you can run the WGCheck and the crash log along with the scan that occurs from the WGCheck can be submitted to CS.

-Hapa

TBH, with you, there will be NO answer that is capable of satisfying what you want to hear specifically @KilljoyCutter I know, because in the multiple threads you have talked about this, I have tried to answer your questions to the fullest extent and you still talk about us not answering you or straight up lying, none of which we have done.

We have not lied, We have not hidden anything in reference to the WGC, within the boundaries of what we are allowed to talk about. We HAVE explained multiple times exactly why this change was coming and why we chose to do it. If you chose to not believe it, there is nothing I can say to change your mind.

Furthermore, we are 100% in compliance with all local laws and all regulatory requirements of the GDPR as well, this has been also stated multiple times.

-Hapa

PS: Any concerns that have to do with your privacy when it comes to our products can be read right here: ...

Aloha,

Though some do not believe this, or think that the WGC being required for the game is some kind of malicious requirement. Once again, this is not true.

The WGC is needed because WG is uniting all of its titles under one launcher as many of the other companies have done. This allows us to unify where all our titles are launched from and will allow us to support game functionality, customer support, update and patching more efficiently and successfully.

This has been explained MANY times throughout the last 4 months.

-Hapa

Standby for words from the Chief,

Captains! Due to the installation of the Update, the server will be unavailable:
From: Wed. Jul. 08 3:00 AM PT
To: Wed. Jul. 08 6:00 AM PT
Update size: 3.2 GB

GERMAN CARRIERS

German carriers IV Rhein, VI Weser, and VIII August von Parseval are entering Early Access! To obtain them, complete combat missions which have specific chances of being dropped from German Carriers containers.

Rewards from Daily Shipments and for completing Directives: German Carriers containers.

Rewards from containers: combat missions that unlock Early Access to German carriers IV Rhein, VI Weser, and VIII August von Parseval; the "Black, White, Red" expendable camouflage; and other desirable rewards.

German Tokens: you can get German Tokens for completing special chains of combat missions. In...

I did read your post, but I think what you do not understand is that a few things would have to happen in order to institute changes like this. Though you think changes might not need much work, ANY changes to MM have serious sweeping effects on MM overall. This is why all the changes we have made to MM over the past 2 yrs have been VERY small in nature and over time.

-Hapa

Changes to Test ships FDR and Slava

https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/49

Please leave your feedback below.

-Hapa

Porta-aviões alemães no Acesso Antecipado, Batalhas Classificatórias e de Clãs, melhorias técnicas e muito mais! Leia no portal

German carriers in Early Access, Clan and Ranked Battles, technical improvements, and much more! Read it on the portal

¡Portaaviones alemanes con Acceso Anticipado, Batallas de Clanes y por Rangos, mejoras técnicas y mucho más! Leer en el portal

Still neither of these has any bearing on the OP.

So we have a track record of NOT changing stats? Because this is 100% not true if this is what you think, because just about every single ship we have ever announced, if not EVERY ship we have ever announced has had adjustments and changes over time through testing.

That being said, these are tech tree ships, which means they may have adjustments to them even after release.

Do we or have we said we always get it right? No, we do not. As is very evident by ships that are fairly new still being adjusted (Kleber, Kremlin) and even ships that are older being adjusted (Hindenberg, US DDs).

Again, back to the OP, I am waiting for these ships to go into testing so we can write surveys on them (on the ST side) and give feedback to have them balanced and changed if needed.

-Hapa

I have already actually suggest a Pink or Orange camo for her...

-Hapa

So the post that you are talking about has had NO responses or engagements in over a year and was actually auto archived WELL before I did this restructuring due to it being part of a news article that was posted in FEB of 2019.

The best thing would be to start a new topic.

-Hapa

So, FIRSTLY I NEVER told anyone that I didn't have time to grind the PR because of my job AND infact DID grind her for free. I just didn't post about it, because I know, for the most part people would not have believed me that I did it and also, I was fairly new to WG overall and didn't know how that would go over. And quite frankly this has NOTHING to do with this OP.

Secondly I am unsure why you should be responding to what I said so angrily, non-constructively or as off topic as you are, with some VERY out of context responses. The OP asked me what I thought of these ships that we JUST announced. I responded with exactly what I thought, that I will wait until I can test and play these ships for myself, whether in test or live.

Considering that ships can change A LOT from beginning to end. I have said for a VERY long time that no reviews or sentiment should be given out about ships that aren't live or ready for release, and this has always been my s...

Aloha,

Sorry I just got to this.

My 2 cents? I will wait until I do testing and the ships are more near release to make a decision on whether I like them or not.

They aren't even in testing yet, though we have data, I tend to change how I play ships based more off how ships feel when I am playing them more than raw data. This may not seem the best way, but it works for me.

-Hapa

But that is the point.

We are NOT looking at doing skill based MM because the metric that you have to figure out to build it would be far too convoluted and difficult.

Rules like "If your W/R is X match vs players that have W/R of X" and now you sit in queue for 3mins or more trying to assemble a team from that.... This is literally one of the main reason we do not and will not look at skill based MMing of any sort currently.

My point is, if you just play the game.... and realize you will have losses you will have wins.... Then it stays a game.

If I am able to take a battle on a team with "avg" or "below avg" players, verses a team with purples (multiple battles) and get the win... I'd say that you skill based MM is not necessary.

-Hapa