Read moreI think it's a mistake to read too much into people criticizing game developers for being low ranked.
I think people just like to get mad at game devs (either because they want to blame others instead of themselves or they're just relentlessly negative) and will find any reason whatsoever to insult them. If the dev is Gold, they're pisslow. If they're Diamond, they're hardstuck. If they're Challenger but lost a game this week, their balance decision will be because they lost that game. If they're a support, they're carried. If they do something new and interesting, it's 200 years and 15-hit passive. If they're a woman, well ...
People are going to find ways to shit on game developers no matter what their rank is, because people on the Internet are shitty to others and instead of discouraging such behavior, the Internet amplifies them.
Normal, sane individuals understand that you don't have to be Challenger to be an authority on the game. The problem is that ...
On a case by case basis I think that's often been true. But as new players come into the community and see dev rank being used as a common way to criticize decisions, they might start using it too without having the personal experience that helps veteran players read between the lines and understand that dev rank isn't actually the source of the problem. Eventually as the playerbase shifts over the years and those younger players become the main core, the community overall starts thinking that "dev rank is the problem" is a reasonable belief, because that's what the individuals within it have said for the entire time they've played League.
IMO conversations like this post helps reset the drift so we don't reach that point -- but yes, as a result it might feel like an overreaction because we're not at that point yet.
(BTW, this is different than if 'lol silver balance team' really was clearly just a meme and never used seriously -- communities are pretty goo...
Read more