Hello.
Please submit a report for any issue you find with your evidence here, so we can investigate properly
Hello.
Please submit a report for any issue you find with your evidence here, so we can investigate properly
The following reported issues have now either been fixed or resolved since release:
Missing pilot night vision
Incorrect Top Speeds
BOL pods and stock AIM-9L cannot be equipped together.
Display in front c*ckpit should have option to display radar
Wing rip G is too low
Engines are far too hot
Wrong type of Skyflash
Some may be pending deployment.
For Skyflash:
Track rate
Lock Range
Target Lead / Gimbal limits
Have all been resolved and will be addressed.
The following also received answers from the devs:
Radar maximum detection range too shor...
Read moreSeveral fixes have already been implemented from earlier reports. More are on the way.
As mentioned however, the radar will be a deeper investigation.
As we have already mentioned, the radar is being investigated for improvements reported.
Similarly any FM issues properly reported will be investigated.
Hi guys
If you are referring to this issue: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/HWrooxRkeEL6
We have a fix incoming. If its another issue, please be sure to submit a report and we can check it out
These missiles are currently not something that will be added outside of a major update, and also not something to expect in the extreme shorter term for now for Tornado.
There is always the possibility payloads may be expanded, but we don't have any news in that area in the short term for now. We are aware of some options however.
Nope, the only thing I was photographing recently was volcanos in Tenerife
Stat card values are generally pre-set values and may not be indicative of the actual performance.
Its best to test the aircraft fully spaded / ace crew and then if there is any discrepancy, that can be reported.
Hello
As the news article explains, the trophy can be obtained simply by playing, the same way the other trophy boxes can. The trophies are available whenever the event is running during the corresponding dates, and as the article also mentions, there will be more ways of obtaining the box in future events and tournaments.
Hello
If you have issues with reports, as it mentions in all sections, you simply need to contact any Tech Moderator or myself via PM. We are able to assist.
We do not "mass delete" reports. If a report does not comply with the guidelines, then as the sections make clear, they will not be accepted. No report is ever deleted.
The reasons for introducing the vehcile for Germany are explained in the original post. This is a different vehcile to the Australian Abrams and there was not a need or requirement for the British tree to receive it.
Hello guys
We indeed have some plans already for the top rank Italian ground forces and improvements to the tree in general.
It's a little too soon for details on spesifcally the SPAAG area, as these will take some time to bring to fruition.
Hello
We have other vehicles planned for the Vickers line. The Challenger 2E was always intended for the Challenger line. Stay tuned to news of future major updates!
Because the MFG has seperate functionality and setup due to the AS.34. However as I mentioned, the issue is known.
Yes this was reported internally and is known.
We are working through those reports that have been made on Aircraft that should have them. If you believe one is missing, it's always best to report it to be sure.
Its not in any current plans, but you can make a historical suggestion for it.
There are no plans to move this vehicle. As explained in the blog, it was added to the tree it was intended to be added too:
As also explained in the blog, other versions for the British tree are under review:
I dont see an open report on that, can you link it please so I can trace it directly?
No worries, I answered yesterday, but you didn't miss much.
The F.58 is superior to the FGA.9 in terms of its missiles, flares and RWR in aviation. Hence why it will be higher. But the FGA.9 remains superior to the F.1 and J34 variants in terms of its characteristics and weaponry.
J34 is already being lowered with these changes. The F.1 currently is placed alongside its main counterparts (F-86F-2 and MiG-17) and fits well where it currently is.
Naturally we are always looking to fill gaps in all trees wherever it is possible.
J34 never received RB24J and as far as we are aware, there is no connection between this aircraft and this missile.
Right now, these changes soley focus on the Hunter series based on current performance and feedback. As always, we will hold our regular BR updates separately...
Read more