Smin1080p

"Gib Chinese squadron vehcile"

*Does exactly that with a unique vehcile*

"NOOO you didn't add this spesific vehcile"

Plenty more options for China ahead to come. But that doesn't stop us adding this one for now. The Type 69IIA is also exclusive to the Chinese sever for now as we have explained before. So I'm not sure why you would be expecting that.

It's Chinese my dude.

Dovblog!

https://warthunder.com/en/news/7809/current/

PS: no this is not the start of the major blogs yet. Still a little wait for those ))

Its expected to be a very short downtime and will generally be done fast. If however its not for any unseen reason and takes longer, then it will be reviewed possibly.

From the photos that do exist, its not even fully clear that they have the rockets loaded. The tank is using the Nebelwerfer rocket launcher or equivalent system of it. Which as you can see both above in the drawing and also in game on the other Nebelwerfer, has the matching protruding rockets when they are actually loaded:

But as ive mentioned before, you are welcome to submit your materials and documents via reports, but sadly the pictures of the unloaded launchers on the Zrínyi tell us nothing.

Ok and you still could have said whatever you needed to say about the event, in the event topic.

I'm sure you don't go to your doctor to raise a complaint about your local supermarket. So much in the same way, please don't just make random off topic posts about things when there are proper topics for such matters.

To remind you of the forum rules:

Do not:

1.1.2. Start or participate in flame wars, intentionally derail
a topic, or post useless spam messages in moderated areas.

1.1.5. Deliberately challenge moderation or administration, if you have issues or concerns
with any actions taken please send a Private Message to Moderators, Senior Moderators or Community Managers/Administrators.

So please take it to the correct topic. Thanks.

We are not even at the 10 years celebration yet. The current event has nothing to do with that at all and also nothing to do with this topic.

The correct place to discuss that would be here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/559673-event-summer-quest-2022/

I'm British so taste is probably not a good scale for me ))

Theres still a bit to go yet before blogs are close, but it's worth the wait. Some very spicy things next major.

The version of the Leopard 2AV featured in the game had a sight without a thermal imaging channel. A characteristic feature that determines this is the partially welded sight window:

Hello

Firstly just to clarify, this is not the section to submit historical reports. That would be here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1951-aircraft/ - Additionally Wikipedia is not considered as a reliable source for reports. You can find out what is here.

Secondly, its intentional for the time being that the F-14 does not have AIM-9L. Many top aircraft could have it, but do not for balancing reasons. Missiles will be distributed based on the balance needs of each aircraft / nation in that context.

Right now, the F-14A is not in any need of the AIM-9L at this time, given its counterparts. It already has sufficient weaponry.

Unfortunately it has nothing to do with preparation of lack of it. We had consistently over 100k+ players online almost daily for some months now over the past period. So it's nothing to do with spikes of any kind.

Server technical issues in spesific geographic locations, ddos / attacks and other issues can come at any time.

The developers are aware and working to resolve the matter.

Devs are aware of the server issues and working to get rectify them.

The Leclerc series has just 2 open reprorts left. All others have been fixed / resolved. One of them is a suggestion for a missing roof MG (something not present on many tanks across the game) and the other is the engine power report.

This report as well as several others regarding engine power clarification is planned to be reviewed when there is a larger clarification across ground vehciles between gross / net power. As currently there are some irregularities.

I would now ask after answering all the matters so far conclusively here, that any further questions or discussions on the Leclerc be taken to a more appropriate topic. This really is not the place.

Unless it's one I've perhaps missed (as I get a lot of PMs), I haven't received any PM from you regarding the escalation of this issue. I would be the correct escalatory point of any issues with bug /...

This isn't a topic to suddenly start asking about every report under the sun. That should be handled by PM. I was clarifying a false assumption that could mislead others of the facts (Which is my job to do here). Not inviting a report check here.

All report clarifications should be handled by PM. Either to me or a senior tech mod. Moderators are checking hundreds of reprorts per day, many of which are spam / not a report. It's possible errors can occur in that.

999 GE currently as per normal.

Just to clarify and clear this one up, the developers responded already as to why its not been "fixed" and a full response was posted:

The information, simply put was insufficient to make any changes. Additional research and efforts are underway to find more meaningful information, but so far nothing has been located. The Leclerc as it currently stands is built on the strongest supported material that can be reliably confirmed. So whilst this report has indeed indicated there may well be some discrepancies with the current sources, what was submitted by itself wasn't enough to make a change.

In such a case, until new and more reliable information can be found, it indeed may well be some time before any changes occur, as if the information cannot be found, then a change cannot be made. Whilst it may be disappointing for those passionate about the Leclerc, which we apricate, what was submitted by itself si...

As I previously explained, we welcome proper reports with sources for anything you believe to be incorrect and can support with material. Unfortunately we can do nothing with the statements made above, especially as the vehcile is not even available to test fully yet and no source links or quotes are provided in your post.

This is not the topic to report any historical issues however.

As I mentioned, there are a total of 3 reports pending. One of which is a camo related matter and one is a shell issue which is treated as a suggestion. So "riddled with inaccuracies" is not really an accurate statement on the matter.

All historical data that the developers are able to obtain on the tanks is used within their development. Again, there are currently a total of 3 reports on the tank pending. One being a camo issue with no gameplay impact, one being a shell performance suggestion, which needs to be validated and the third is a possible legitimate historical issue with the reverse gears. There are no other reports open or pending that I can see on the Turan.

As always, we welcome any further reports on any other issues that have not yet reported. Hopefully this answers your questions. However its best to now restore this topic back onto subject matter, as this discussion isn...