tiggr

Originally posted by feedbackforblueballs

What?

It's filled to the brim with explosive spam man. The ammo supply station cooldown allows for it too, people play around them due to it. You get 7 explosives every time you click E on a supply station bin / calldown bin. That's 7+ easy kills for some people.

On the new Fortress Hamada for example you can be top 5 every round on defense by sitting next to the ammo bin on the right with Piat and Dynamite, never shooting any gun. I have regularly got multi kills just throwing dynamite over the walls and by the time I'm done sending my 3 PIATs the ammo bin resupply cooldown is ready. The explosive spam never left the Battlefield, at least not the BF5 I have played.

edit - I replied to tiggr and I'm a bit peeved that he would delete his comment. I hope he didn't think I was attacking him and what he said wasn't objectively wrong, just biased as per usual with a game dev. I just think that if the DICE devs think that explosive spam is gone they aren't...

Read more

Originally posted by Slap-Control

wait they did panzerstorm, firestorm was done by a thirdparty studio.... what is dice stockholm doing?

Originally posted by NoctyrneSAGA

Yeah, that's why the crates in BF1 were changed from 3.5m to 7m.

The effect radius of the Ammo Crate and Medical Crate have been raised from 3.5m to 7m. This means teammates do not have to stack extremely tightly to gain their benefits

Originally posted by DMan304

I'm pretty sure they said that test was purposefully an extreme example, and it never looked quite that bad in the game.

Originally posted by TheClosetIndian

I believe he said September due to paternity leave.

Originally posted by DRUNKKZ3

Tweeting this right away

Originally posted by SeeNights

I tried in multiplayer and it doesn't work, so it only works in training mode ! :)

Originally posted by Junoviant

Funny, after I left EA I just assumed everyone else was backwards. Haha

Originally posted by InfiniteVergil

Also, crouched running! f**k yeah

Originally posted by cenorexia

This problem came with BF1 and it annoys me just as much.

It's like the game tells tell you there might be a transport vehicle on that flag, but maybe it's already gone, who knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Originally posted by phantasatron

Indeed. While working with the devs on BF1: Incursions, it seemed like we all came to the conclusion that they were only working on it so that it could be implemented in the next Battlefield. /u/tiggr denied this until the very end, but here we are.

Originally posted by SirFappington007

Is it possible to give more information in the new fiscal year? It's info and hype this game needs to shut everyone up

Originally posted by UltraPlayGaming

So, in theory, say in the case of a map like Monte Grappa, it would be easier to do from scratch because it's harder to polish an existing map? I assume it's because BF1 has assets that do not exist in BFV and would be harder to port and polish those assets to meet current standards compared to doing things from scratch?

Originally posted by NozGame

It's nice to tell us that there's some good stuff coming, really. But I feel like you guys have been saying this for months and I just can't see the good stuff. Even the most basic things still haven't made it into the game.

Originally posted by weedisgay

I see so many developers saying can't when i think what you mean is won't. What would actually happen if you were to go into some detail and specifics on stuff that's already confirmed to be coming? I understand if you don't want to specifically mention maybe content but what is the actual reason you can't tell about stuff that is 100% confirmed?

Originally posted by UltraPlayGaming

I understand how much you guys care about this game, and how much love you want to put into it, but the community is very hungry for new maps outside of a BR-restricted map, and I'm sorry if we are directly coming at you with this barrage of content-hunger.

However, I do have a couple of ideas I want to present in the form of some questions, if you want to read them! I'm obviously not a game dev, so I couldn't tell how difficult these ideas would be in reality, but I'm curious about what would happen if you guys did these.

My first set of questions is; would it be a feasible option for you guys to port maps from BF1 over to BFV, considering both games use the Frostbite 3 engine? If not, why?

Secondly, would it be a feasible option for the Dev Team(s) to port sections of the Firestorm map into Conquest / Other Mode variants for people to play on the base game modes? If not, why?