Smin1080p

Whilst you are entirely welcome to hold an opinion on something and dissagee constructively, insulting other forum members is not permitted and is a breach of forum rules. There is no reason or justification to insult other members you disagree with.

A reminder of the rules:

Do Not:

1.1.1. Insult any forum
members, Gaijin employee or forum staff.

1.1.2. Start or participate in flame wars, intentionally derail a topic, or post useless spam
messages in moderated areas.

Hello

There are no plans to change the A-10 Early.

We have numerous vehicles across the game which may be of the same variant, but can represent an "early" or "late" stage of that aircrafts lifespan. It does not mean that a separate variant is denoted, but simply the representation of that aircraft is defined by a specific time period in its history. This is exactly the case with the A-10A Early and Late. There were weaponry/equipment differences that are reflected in game. A whole new separate variant is not required to denote it as "Early" or "Late" as it can be the same variant, reflected at two different stages.

Right now both of these variants are as intended.

Discussing rumours is one thing and entirely fine. Going into in depth discussions about a possible tree, structure, vehicles and everything else with no basis for that type of discussion and when a purpose built section exists was the point I was addressing

Trust me, I haven't missed anything.

We add new decals all the time. Some for events, specials, packs or a myriad of other reasons. The fact they may be from a nation not fully represented with a full tree in game does not mean this is the place to have pages long discussions about a possible tree, placement or the vehciles within it.

If you want to discuss nations not in game yet, we have a dedicated section for that. A bunch of decals appearing in the files don't mean anything about a CBT or full tree. Until there are reasonable grounds to do so, there are more relivant places to discuss things like that.

You know by now how this topic works.

As others have already explained, the details of the event (including the seperate purchase of the Soccer ball Piñata and Piñata stick) can be found in the official news article: https://warthunder.com/en/news/8160-special-lucky-piñata-en

Guys, once again, I'm not sure why we are discussing random nations and sub trees.

Please use the appropriate sections to discuss nations not in game: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/939-international-tech-tree-project-unofficial/

We have actually had some additional clarification from the devs regarding that. The rebalance that took place was indeed a one time change. The new economy system based on vehicle rank, which evens out the costs of identical / similar vehicles and also itself further prevents event vehicles from very high repair costs superseded this approach. So under the latest economy conditions, the Tornado already correspond its rank and counterpart as intended.

I redirected you to a whole section where you can talk about trees

https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/939-international-tech-tree-project-unofficial/

If you need any in particular, please send a PM.

A reminder please guys. This section:

https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/939-international-tech-tree-project-unofficial/

And this topic:

Both exist for a reason. Please do not off topic spam here.

This was generally part of a wider one-time rebalancing at the time, as some event vehicles had very high repair costs compared to researchable vehicles at the same BR. Few, if any had identical repair costs as their linear counterparts, such is the case as currently with the two German IDS variants. However its something that can be raised and taken into consideration in the next economy update.

Hello

I have forwarded the report. In a case where your report has not received an answer, please PM myself or any Technical Moderator.

We dont have any news at this time of when that will be. Naturally we have the weekly QoLs that can contain a plethora of things, but some elements can be kept for a major in instances of a larger / wider rework or rebalance.

Hello

Lots of aircraft that could carry AIM-9L do not have it in game. Missile loadouts are not and have never been 1:1 historical loadouts.

Even the Phantoms at 11.3 do not have AIM-9Ls. So this is not a historical matter that prevents the aircraft from getting these missiles.

The F-4F was recently lowered to 10.7 based on player feedback, where its performing very solidly and is one of the higher aircraft at that BR in efficiency. Therefor there are no plans right now to provide the current F-4F variants with AIM-9L.

There are also multiple topics already open on the F-4F and even more specifically, this very matter. Please use them rather than starting another new one:

Please report any issues here:

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder

Hello.

Please submit a report for any issue you find with your evidence here, so we can investigate properly

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder

The following reported issues have now either been fixed or resolved since release:

Missing pilot night vision




Incorrect Top Speeds




BOL pods and stock AIM-9L cannot be equipped together.




Display in front c*ckpit should have option to display radar




Wing rip G is too low




Engines are far too hot




Wrong type of Skyflash

Some may be pending deployment.

For Skyflash:

Track rate


Lock Range


Target Lead / Gimbal limits

Have all been resolved and will be addressed.

The following also received answers from the devs:

Radar maximum detection range too shor...

Several fixes have already been implemented from earlier reports. More are on the way.

As mentioned however, the radar will be a deeper investigation.

As we have already mentioned, the radar is being investigated for improvements reported.

Similarly any FM issues properly reported will be investigated.

Hi guys

If you are referring to this issue: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/HWrooxRkeEL6

We have a fix incoming. If its another issue, please be sure to submit a report and we can check it out