Smin1080p

There are already other aircraft occupying 11.3/11.7/12.0 ratings. As mentioned, currently the F-4E suits its current BR in terms of performance and is in line with capabilities of other aircraft(s) at that BR rank.

Across the game there are many aircraft that could consecutively carry better and better missiles. However its not planned to keep upgrading each and every one of them with their best weapon systems in every case. Some are intended to either represent specific variants / periods or are intended to fill a position on the tree for balance purposes. Naturally this always has the possibility to change in the future as its down to the developers discretion. However at this time, I was simply explaining its not currently planned for the F-4E to receive AIM-9L or AIM-7F.

Not planned. As these would result in a BR increase. Right now the aircraft is suited well to its BR and tree position.

Hello.

As you can see from the report:

As for other historical reports, we are still operating the forum section for another week for new submissions and will process all reports even after closure.

We are looking into this possibility.

Hi guys

We are aware of this and plan to include rockets in the loadouts of the Italian P-47D-30 too

Hello

We have this in mind and in the future, its indeed possible that crew voices for subtree nations (such as Finland and South Africa) may well appear in game.

Hey!

Thanks for the feedback. We are always looking to improve maps and are monitoring the responses to the most recent changes.

I would however recommend that for all changes relating to the most recent major update, please leave your feedback here:

Alternatively, you can make more comprehensive suggestions for maps here:

https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1393-maps-and-missions/

I have moved this topic to a more appropriate location

Hello

Please create a bug report here with your issue, information and evidence: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder

This area is not the place to report an issue.

Hello

The MiG-29 is a Rank VIII aircraft. As with all other ranks, each new rank requires a set amount of vehicles in the previous rank to be researched in order to gain access to the next one. So whilst having the MLA allows the MiG-29 line to progress, in order to unlock Rank VIII for research, you must first research the required number of vehicles in Rank VII, similar to how you did with the previous ranks.

If you believe you have lost progress / research, please contact Gaijin support. Sadly we cannot assist you with such issues here on the forum: https://support.gaijin.net/hc/en-us/categories/200005031-War-Thunder

Hello

We are currently investigating a number of reports on this matter:

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/zCu41suoecVp

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/64AwOBk6Slm6

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4RL3lohztcYM

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nEa5KiHURcZ5

Currently the reproducibility is somewhat random and any and all f...

Please use the existing update discussion to discuss changes in the update

Popping back in quickly just to say, i'm not sure where this started, but the rumor is false. Just to save you pages of speculation.

With that, ill go back to my vacation

Yes. The aircraft is in the update.

I'm currently away however (before anyone asks about configuration details etc). So please stay tuned.

Hey. I'm currently away at the moment. However yes we do plan to look into drop tanks for the other variants in future updates.

The aircraft was physically incable of carrying them as far as I remember. So yes it does matter if it doesn't have the equipment to use them.

It's not planned in this update.

I'm currently away for a few days.

The range of mode information was confirmed and provided by the developers. It should have both a 32 and 64 mode.

If it's indeed a bug that it's not working as it should or is displayed internally, I will check the report status when I'm back next week.

EJ Kai never had any as far as I remember. There were a couple of mockup bombs hung on for an arm's expo. But it was reported to remove them at the time as far as I remember there is nothing solid on the aircraft ever receiving them. But as always, if you have new information, feel free to submit a new report.

But politics have no place in the discussion of the AJ.

Political background has no place in game. This has no relivance to the game or any addions too it.

Please stop discussing political matters on the forum. As per the rules, political discussions are not permitted.

It's not a major rule change or anything. The reasoning behind the F-16AJ was explained in the blogs. It's an exceptional circumstance that provides a balanced option currently. The Yak-141 also already has other Aircraft like that in game (trialed / tested / planned weponary or features).

Guys, its possible to discuss things without getting into accusations, insults and personal matters.

Please keep it respectful and civil per the forum rules:

Dear players!

As you know, over a year ago we launched our dedicated Community Bug Reporting platform and transitioned bug reports that were less suited to the forum. We wanted to let you know in advance that the next stage of that transition will begin in 2 weeks time as we transition historical reports off the forum to move all issue reports to the Community Bug Site. During this time, we recommend you familiarize yourself with the site and if you have any questions or require support, please free free to PM myself or any Technical Moderator!

From the 17th March, the historical report section on the forum will be closed from accepting new topics. So that we can process all the remaining pending reports. Between now and then, you can continue to make reports on the forum. After this date, all reports will be made on the Community Bug Report site.

- No existing reports that have bee...