Smin1080p

Physical tracks have been enabled on PC.


ZTZ99 - A bug that caused the coaxial machine gun to not aim vertically has been fixed.


F2G - The glazing for the aircraft c*ckpit has been fixed.


ZSU-37-2 - The radar model in the tank X-ray has been fixed.

The current provided changelog reflects the major changes within the game as part of this Update. Some updates, additions and fixes may not be listed in the provided notes. War Thunder is constantly improving and specific fixes may be implemented without the client being updated.

Discuss it here!

Physical tracks have been enabled on PC.


ZTZ99 - A bug that caused the coaxial machine gun to not aim vertically has been fixed.


F2G - The glazing for the aircraft c*ckpit has been fixed.


ZSU-37-2 - The radar model in the tank X-ray has been fixed.

The current provided changelog reflects the major changes within the game as part of this Update. Some updates, additions and fixes may not be listed in the provided notes. War Thunder is constantly improving and specific fixes may be implemented without the client being updated.

Luckily it does not effect my 2 jobs (WT and my other one), I am already with my family and I can still play the game and build models, so all is well for me thank you )))

Verbal warnings have been issued already to those offending. Should they continue, it will be more severe.

Indeed, it would be good if everyone could have everything. But the USSR is not in need of a new top fighter right now after the MiG-21Bis and thus a BVR capable will come later on when its ready and when its more required. As of right now, the MiG-21Bis is one of the best aircraft in game.

It also has nothing to do with being scared of giving BVR missiles to those nations. Moreso the platform that actually carries them is even better than the MiG-21Bis, so its not needed right now.

Thats the end of this discussion. If you want to talk about it more. Move it to the correct topic. It wont be warned again.

Most kills at top tier are not made with BVR missiles right now. They make up a much smaller % than kills with missiles like R-60, Magic and AIM-9J.

Because someone posts something, does not mean you are obligated to respond and restart a discussion over and over, especially when you have already been warned.

I think we are ready to change this to the "Suffering" Roundup topic. Because thats mostly what it is right now.

What it is in real life and what it does in the game are often two separate things, Its really irrelevant whats an interdictor or whats the logical progression in terms of variants. Thats not what I was talking about. The Buccaneer is going to be used exactly the same as a Canberra just with Sidewinders rather than guns and be better at CAS.

Im fully aware of what the Buccaneer was IRL.

The reasoning was explained in the dev blog: https://warthunder.com/en/news/6915-development-fleet-research-changes-and-the-first-battleships-en

As for other trees, there are no plans to split any more right at this moment.

The possibility is open for a nation of have one or both types of Naval tree now.

Unfortunately this vehicle was a proposal / mock-up only. So it was not viable for introduction.

Thats mostly due to R-13M not being present, which thus far are still unproven on Soviet examples apart from the only valid secondary source posted so far in the OP.

More a question for the marketing team im afraid.

BRs are never calculated based on an aircrafts stock performance. Otherwise the Hunter F.6 would be different entirely.

As I previously said, 10.0 is the introductory BR. If it does poorly, it will go down. If not, it will remain. Its an improvement over the F-13.

Perhaps read the topic title and original post and everyone that agreed with it. Thats why.

As I just said, it does not fit well in that line as it would have to go between the Scimitar and Phantom. Its better suited in the bomber line as its main role in game is an evolution of what the Canberra B.6 does.

Allow me to answer this as I do and I know. F-111 is not coming now. So I would suggest you stop ignoring multiple warnings.

This thread is for discussing rumors. Not baseless speculation and wishlisting of what you think will / want to see come. If you want to wishlist or discuss aircraft that are not rumoured, confirmed or on topic, use the proper places. You will not be warned again.

There is a whole forum outside of this topic. Please use it.

It had no logical position in the FAA line between the Scimitar and Phantom so the bomber line makes the most sense and does not prevent further additions in future there.

Once again, hardly any info or proper sourcing thats required to implement and again based around the Starstreaks system that lead people to ask for an ADASTS system in the first place. We dont rule out further SPAA, but this was one that was asked for.