Smin1080p

VT-1 was part of the program for this vehicle being introduced. We don't and have never based things on "operational service" as the criteria to add something.

And indeed, whilst the FlaRakRad and VT-1 on it are to do with the next update, the last 3 pages of off topics about possible French variants are nothing to do with the next update.

We have a French Ground Forces section where you can discus that and a suggestion section where you can submit proposals. This is not the place.

Nobody is dismissing your concerns. Simply asking that you used the correct place.

Plenty of the people in this discussion are quick to jump on others when going off topic, yet are now doing it themselves.

Well thats more down to personal opinion, but yes in general

If we only count "used" as something used operationally, then lots of French Vehicles and weaponry suddenly fall under this category too. So it works both ways. You cant be selective when it works only in your favor and not for everyone else.

Regardless, none of this has anything to do with this topic.

Not with this patch. France have something better to look forward too this patch than a truck ))

Major update: Eurotruck Thunder )))

Joke inb4 "SmIN CoNfIRmED pAtCH nAmE"

It's definitely more solid than anything previous as it actually contains a value.

This was done when we were close to Rank VII for ground and we are not there for Aircraft right now.

Nothing in any immediate plans. It means nothing really. Germany just has a very large tree and the Panzer III makes sense as a reserve.

This was a comment left next to the Panzer III. Which we intend to make a reserve vehicle. I have no idea where you got 7.0 from here.

There is nothing to comment on, which is what your not understanding. We never said they all would 100% happen for sure by the end of the year and thats a promise. We never said there wont be things added that we never even mentioned in that Q and A that you never even knew were coming.

The point is, your looking for an answer that does not exist.

Because the year is also not over and its not a case that things didnt go to plan for us. As I said, game development is fluid and plans change. It does not mean things did not go to plan for us back when we discussed our general plans 12 months ago.

Thats not what was said at all. If you read the article and the question he's responding too, its referring to plans. Not promises.

We are always very skeptical about giving too much away in advance as we did previously many years ago with the "planned aircraft trees" for this exact reason. Whenever we dare to deviate or things dont come exactly as/when expected, there are claims of broken promises and untrustworthiness.

Plans change. Game development is not a set in stone thing, but fluid and timelines are not always an A to B to C matter.

The interview was discussing what we had planned for this year in broad general terms. Not 100% promises and confirmed things set in stone.

Some people are referring to it like it was committed promises and how it "must happen" because it was said there. When its not the case.

Guys. We have a Naval Section.

If you want to wishlist and just discuss ships, please do so there: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/495-naval-discussion/

Right now we are spiraling into random off topic discussions.

Once again, a weapon / cannon / bomb / armamennt of any kind being in the files means nothing. The amount of people that assume something is coming soon based on this seems to be growing, when its just not the case.

I have no idea why this keeps coming up, but Hoods not coming.

Please take the wishlisting to the correct place.

Guys, we are 2 blogs in. We are not saying anything yet.

Its not the only British vehicle.

If all goes to plan, then there will be yes.

VFM is all for this patch. But as we said, the future is bright ))

Ive already said twice now it's not coming anytime soon.

Yes. There are no new nations.