Smin1080p

The developers are aware of the communities concerns in these areas.

Spawn areas and map terrain on several locations has already been adjusted to prevent spawn-spawn shooting and the remaining ones as we have already said are planned to be investigated also.

Bombers very much do have a role and many of them continue to be the most played and used aircraft. The recent changes to remove airfield destruction were done based on the feedback of the community as a whole. Bombers being able to end games via base destruction was not popular for the whole community. There are also other ways bombers can be deployed and contribute towards a victory and we will continue to monitor the situation for them as well as any feedback and suggested changes that the whole community can agree on as a positive. Air RB for example over the past 2 patchs has seen a number of improvements that came from a previous roundup of community fee...

We listen to all feedback. Nothing selective about it.

There is a big difference between something that takes time, investigation and further review than just simple "quick fixes".

Lots of changes are made across the board, some without bug reports, so trying to justify every change with whatever singular source we list on the patchnotes is logical. We cant list every source used for every change because the changelog would then become enormous.

Where did i say this?

Please do not just twist the context of my words to suit whatever situation you can link it too. Each case is different and every matter thats properly reported will be reviewed and where it is proven correct, will be actioned. Not to mention, it has quite literally no relation or connection to "money" at all. Creating links where there are none are rathe...

1) Once again, nobody was insulted or made fun of. Please do not make such clearly false accusations.

2) That is your personal opinion. I would remind you that this is a video game and realism is at its core as far as possible. But of course there have to be compromises for the sake of gameplay and balance. If you have things you would like to see changed or improved, we have a suggestions area where you can post your proposals and allow the community to vote on them. If you think you have found legitimate issues, then please bring them with your evidence to the bug reports section. Otherwise, this has no relation to this topic at all.

3) The majority of the player-base dont agree or share the same sentiment that this is an issue. We of course will always investigate legitimate community concerns, but there is nothing of substance in this topic so far for anyone to investigate. Its a personal opinion with no eviden...

Theres no "victim mentality" here. Major updates have always been filled with thousands of fixes that go totally unrecognized.

Im simply stating the facts. We have thousands of fixes every major that go totally ignored. Thats clearly evidenced here when we have major content updates with lots of fixes, followed closely by a smaller update with lots of fixes and then a further major update with lots of quality of life changes and improvements. There is always going to be that follow on of "ok but what about this". No matter what we do thats never going to stop.

The issue is everyone has different things they consider priority and important without seeing the full perspective as a whole.

Often its just assumed everything is "easy" to fix without considering the fuller and wider implications and factors.

Nobody is expecting to receive anyone as a "s...

Which is quite interesting. Because when we have the larger patches (from a pure vehicle count perspective) we have the exact opposite claims that there is too much content, too many issues and not enough fixes. "less content Gaijin, more fixes!"

Yet when we have a patch with fewer vehicles, but more quality of life fixes and improvements, lots of bug fixes and general positive changes across the game, the comments become about how "disappointing" or "boring" it is. "More content Gaijin, not enough!"

One thing is said one time, then the complete opposite the next

Ah yes, how dare we be human beings and make a lighthearted joke every now and again?

Because of that, the game is somehow dead (75,000 people in game as we speak) and we should shut it down?

Nobody is making fun of anyone here. There is nothing of substance here we can "focus on" to "make the game better".

Please, lets be serious here. If there was something serious of concern here for anyone, then to intestate, proper evidence, clips, replays and files should have been provided in a bug report so that the issue can be properly analysed and reviewed / tested.

Instead, we have a topic with no evidence, personal bias and then false claims from you that we somehow artificially buff things because its new. Once again, a totally unbacked claim.

I would say im shocked this is up to 21 pages already somehow, but then again...

This is why nobody messed with the Swedes ))

Thank you. Short clips such as these, especially those that specifically compare are useful indeed.

No candidate for China was found. So the Type 69-IIG came instead.

The vast majority of claimed ghost shell cases investigated turn out to be a multitude of things that often are not the game itself. Indeed there are instances where it can be the game, but many other factors such as client connection, background processes, streaming, ping/latency, sever location and a plethora of other reasons can come into play.

Thats why its important, when you believe you encounter a case of this issue, you correctly bug report it here with the evidence, your client log and server replay so it can be properly investigated.

We have over 800 aircraft in game and that number is ever growing. Its impossible to give all of them all of the camos people want to see as everyone has their own preferences and wishlist's.

MiG-21SMT already has 2 additional market skins in game whilst many others have none.

I understand you wish to see some for this aircraft, however so do many others for lots of vehicles in game.

WT Live as you say has a huge variety of skins you can use exactly as you wish to see them in the meantime.

Everyone is hardly going to stop playing Japan just because you do. No it does not damage the data and there is still feedback to take into account.

There were 2 dev servers where everyone was able to play and leave feedback. All of that feedback was indeed forwarded.

However no amount of playtesting (both internally or externally on the dev server) can ever be sufficient to decide what BRs are going to need changing due to meta shifts without adequate game data to prove it.

As I said, its known. Jaguar wont be getting many of the later warheads discussed, but its possible its going to get some of the early ones on this variant of the aircraft.

We will of course monitor all data and feedback and review the numbers after a period of collection and analysis. Understandably this change may have some effects on the meta.

They are planned to come on a later variant.

All official skin contests are done this way. This one was no exception.

Its simply a fun contest to reward creators and their good work.

Its possible more F-104 skins will be introduced via the market place. But we never claimed this competition would do that. It was just for fun and to promote creators.

@Einherjer1979 @[email protected]

Any replays from today or clips would be greatly appreciated o7

We have asked the developers.

No. As I already said, it was supposedly fixed. We have asked again whats happening.

Replays or clips from the current version would be most appreciated.