Smin1080p

This is totally contradictory. You claimed originally "Gaijin hate British" because you were unaware the FAA used Hurricane Mk Is and now its because there is no reward plane for the Germans?

Quite how that translates into being something against the British im unsure. There is no reward plane for the Germans for this event because it celebrates the 80th anniversary of the battle which was a British victory and German loss. This it makes no sense.

The new premium Hurricane is an entirely historical aircraft and appropriate for the event as the FAA also made contributions both in pilots and aircraft to the battle.

Im not sure if this is once again a serious claim as there are barely any mentions of these aircraft outside of this forum area. If you look at the forum in general, website, Reddit, Social Media etc you would see seeing the larger picture that ...

How exactly does a correct and historical aircraft = "Gaijin hate British" ?

The FAA operated regular land based Hurricanes as well as Sea Hurricanes.

Im not really sure if you are being truly serious with some of the comments here. Tomorrow is Battle of Britain day, the most famous and recognized day regarding the Battle and commemorations for the battle usually take place in September.

Outside of the old Chronicles (which was task specific) events typically dont count towards challengers.

The event is there as an extra bonus for those who enjoy historical battles.

As much as this is secretly one of my favorite aircraft, not anytime soon. Its certainly not in any immediate plans.

It was posted back at the start of the year. Its nothing new and this isnt a Puma discussion.

Just to be crystal clear in case it was not already. These changes reflect the passing of suggestions, not the implementation of vehicles themselves.

That decision, lies ultimately with the developers. The change has been made to at least allow the proposals of such vehicles and give considerations to some vehicles otherwise not.

Guys, we are heading down that avenue again. Please take the correct junction.

2 years before France was even in the game as a full nation. As I said, after that, its not planned to return as its a collectible vehicle from the past like many others.

This is a Battle of Britain event. Not the Battle of France. We have a ore suitable and new premium for the focus of this event and I think its fair to say the general reception to it has been positive.

I understand you want to see more French aircraft, but that has nothing to do with this event or topic.

Nothing to "troll" about in this event.

D.521 is a rare event vehicle that wont be returning to the British or French tree anytime in the foreseeable future. It will remain a collectible for those that have it.

Thats an awfully big interpenetration if you got all that from what I said. I also said nothing of the next patch just to point out.

Unfortunately this is currently not possible as its a limitation of console platforms. We are always trying to make considerations and alternatives for console players in this area to allow them to also access the same content as far as possible.

Typically we are always trying to expand the variety within skin boxes and avoid the same aircraft getting too many market skins for example whilst others have none at all. Some jets already have 2-3 so we are trying to spread things out, whilst also showcasing the wide array of work done on WT.Live.

The popular skins voted and shared gain more attention, along with the most discussed and highest quality.

Right now we dont have plans to introduce more boxes in-between majors, rather expand the roster of skins in every major update box.

Regarding the balance and meta changes caused by the volumetric shell change, there will be a deep review into economics and BRs as a result and any necessary changes made to better suit balance now.

As for volumetric armour, we are expanding the roster of vehicles with volumetric armou...

As we saw recently with the US Air tree changes, its not unheard of to create new lines when a tree gets big enough. But at the moment, there are not enough aircraft to do this.

Economic updates come separately from a major. Around the time of a major update, there is a flood of people trying to play the new vehicles, so it can often skew numbers in some cases. So we tend to allow things to settle and review all the data after a stable period.

A lot of the major common points have already received answer either in recent Q and As or posts by Community Managers on the forum.

Regarding the Top BR range, we have said on several occasions that as soon as its possible to expand BR tiers in any area of the game without causing detrimental results, we will do so. It is not a case of us simply not doing something that can be done right now, its a case of something that is wanted but cannot be done without harm right now. There are a number of factors towards this.

Queue times is indeed a core focus above many others and its very easy to fall into the trap of saying "but I have 1 minute queue times all the time". Which, indeed is possible during EU and US prime times for example. But outside of those times, its not always the case. The game does not revolve around EU/US prime times. We have players all over the world, so whilst expanding BRs or creating new BR lo...

Oh good, it does work then

That was just a test.

I would like to ask everyone again, to please take all MiG-23 debates and discussions to their appropriate topic(s). This one has been derailed several times over the last week and the same people repeatedly ignoring previous requests to remain on topic and use the appropriate areas.

MiG-23 is not to be discussed here.

We really do not want to start issuing warnings for those who just keep ignoring this, but we can always change MiG-23 > Po-2 in case

Guys, everything has already been forwarded. Its very clear by now something went wrong during the process of this ships sourcing/construction and a mistake has occurred. There is no need to keep going round with the sources here.

As I said yesterday, the developers immediately jumped on the situation and are working to rectify it now. We hope to have some more news on the situation in the near future, but the ship wont arrive in the configuration showed in the blog currently.

There is no need to start attacking moderation or anyone else for trying to explain the situation and how sometimes, mistakes and errors can occur. Unfortunately thats a side effect of a game of our scope and scale. Its been caught before the ship has even entered the game and whilst it was still in development and will be rectified.

Nobody has said at any stage that any line in the game is "full". We have not stopped adding low tier aircraft as evident by all the recent major updates.

Both are 10.0

Once again, we did not only just add Sea Mines this patch. Please check the changelog in full as well as the last 3 majors. They are full of bugfixes and improvements for naval.

Naval mines have also mostly have a positive reception too. But as with all new mechanics and features, there are the potential for bugs that dont show themselves on test servers.

As we have already explained, since the last session, the devs have been working to resolve the technical issues and bugs that occurred that are now also preventing its return. It was not just a singular matter and sometimes a fix can create a new issue.

When everything is fully resolved, it will return.

Nothing in that topic changes what I said. There is no other game out there simulating a realistic setting as we do. Picking out one element of that is Irrelevant and does not change the context of what I was talking about since thats an entirely different matter.

There is no arrogance here. I was simply explaining why some of the perceived issues in War Thunder Naval exist and some of the more complex reasonings behind why Naval development is more technically sophisticated than other games. No other game has ever truly replicated ships in as much detail and in the realistic based setting we have.

Even comparing Naval to Ground is two very different entities and technical levels.

Ive already made it clear that everything has been forwarded and a full investigation is underway, with any necessary changes to be made.