Its the weekend right now so there's no news to share at the moment. As we mentioned in the pinned news article, once its fully stabilized and over, we will give some more details.
Its the weekend right now so there's no news to share at the moment. As we mentioned in the pinned news article, once its fully stabilized and over, we will give some more details.
We dont have one planned as far as im aware.
You are watching The Shooting Range – a weekly show for all tankers, airmen and Captains in War Thunder.
In this episode:
Pages of History: An Attack Helicopter for China
Squadmates: Winning on Berlin
... And Metal Beasts: The French “Sky Fighter”
The War Thunder Team
Thank you for the report and updating the sourcing info. Forwarded to the devs for review.
As I said in the same post, there is the potential for more things not shown to come this update or naturally the next across the board. What they are specifically we are not going to go into detail just yet.
Yes. Finland was planned.
Guys, the topic is descending into a bit of random jet discussion that doesn't actually have any grounding for the current major update.
I would just like to remind everyone that things being in the files don't mean its automatically coming this update. Whilst there is still the potential for some things still to make it, there is also another major towards the end of the year. Until something has more grounding than a few texture files, its not the place to be going into in depth back and forth loadout and national debates on the subject.
Discussions on general high rank aviation speculation, balance, missiles etc can be taken here:
That's not exactly correct. It doesn't actually confuse anything, more ensures that anything you don't believe is correct and want to ensure all information makes it in time rather than waiting until afterwards.
There's no harm at all in submitting a report even when something is WIP, as the Harrier GR.7 showed. Many of the issues were resolved before the reports were even checked, however the reports ensured it was all covered regardless.
Reports can be made if anyone has viable material to report with (that is fully declassified and meets the criteria) if anyone wishes: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder
All armour profiles on the dev server are currently WIP however.
Which as I've already pointed out, is incorrect, as the weapon integration and the firing trials were conducted by Leonardo s.p.a. and were not managed or sponsored by the British MOD.
Indeed the one that actually directly benefitted from this very specific aircraft configuration was the Egyptian Air Force: tps://www.scramble.nl/military-news/modification-to-egypt-air-force-aw149s
In any case, I'm not going to further report this self-explanatory inconsistency.
Your welcome to disagree with the suggestion as a proposal. However it was tested with consideration by the country its being suggested for in this topic, therefor its viable to suggest and for developer consideration much like the Swedish MI-28 and Apache. Beyond that, its do...
Read moreThere is the Anniversary event between the two majors. As there has been for the last 10 years.
This isn't an "Anniversary update". The anniversary is a separate event that happens every year and every year we also happen to have a major around about the same monthly time period close to the anniversary. They have never been labelled as "anniversary" updates.
There is still some things to be shown and of course another major before the end of the year too.
Reports are welcome on any further missing loadouts.
Nords and Napalm were reported for the G.91Y: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/dGYSNQvabvaU
The developers are still evaluating them currently.
Both appear to be G.91, not G.91Y.
Devs are asking for G.91Y specific.
Removed some off topic comments. Providing feedback on a suggestion is fine. Derailing it and questioning moderation is not appropriate here. If you have issues with Suggestion Moderation or the acceptance crtiera, it should be raised via PM to a Senior Suggestion Moderator and then ultimately me via escalatory procedure.
This suggestion meets the criteria set to be an accepted Suggestion and also for developer consideration. As a Suggestion Moderator Thatz is well aware of this and checked with colleagues to confirm it was suitable to do so.
Placeholder model at the moment.
No news on them this update currently.
The developers have looked a bit further, currently they are trying to find some more info out on it. AS.20 was not actually mentioned in any of the documentation, just shown in some photographs, but its a bit obscured.
AS-30L is also being reviewed further. We have a document with it mentioned, but again nothing showing it mounted on the G.91Y. So they are currently looking for some more info on it before making a final decision.
We already have Finland as two new lines in Sweden. So there won't be another whole nation on top of that no.
New Power was an exceptionally large update as it was the 2.0 update. We have Finland joining the game where Israel did last year with a ground and air branch in the same patch. Setting up a path for more domestic units in the future ahead.