devtrackers.gg
Walking is good for the mind
Walking is good for the mind
This missile did not exist in real life, so its not viable for implementation into War Thunder.
If you have a serious suggestion for new weaponry, please create a suggestion topic, not a general discussion topic: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1374-aircraft-suggestions/
Its not been dropped. We just currently don't have another one in the works at this moment in time.
https://warthunder.com/en/game/about/
Our game is based around military vehicles. Seeing combat or fighting in a war has and will never be a requirement for something to be in game. At no point in the games history has it ever been stated otherwise.
One of the main key aspects of the game is the virtual combat with machines that never saw action against each other or perhaps never took part in any battle at all. But none the less, are both significant and unique for players to enjoy.
Panther II, King Tiger 105 and Flak 341 were removed for their historical inaccuracies and will not be available again.
Allow me to say there is no chance this is. Its not an update. Its an event.
More details next week.
Photoshopped / Inspect edited. Not what was said.
There has never been an anniversary update and we gave no expectations that there would be. We always have an event, and this one will be the biggest yet anniversary wise.
Nope. If you read the blog it makes it all clear.
Well there is another update this year like there always is, just it's a long way away towards the end of the year.
There has never been an "anniversary major" patch.
Nope it's a Dev blog.
I don't know why people are claiming theres another major coming for the anniversary. The anniversary has always been an event, not a patch.
The tweet that DMM posted was a user model / Mission. If that wasn't clear already.
Please be sure to submit bug reports here: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder
We are reviewing all reports there.
Report forwarded thank you: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/chqrap8AJ0N9
Generally it's simply taken on a case by case basis of the aircraft. We can pass these on for review and see what the outcome is. However I'm fairly sure it's already been checked out.
In this case, there's sources that spesifcally say takeoff was an issue as well as limiting fuel load when the 16 X 1000 payload was tested.
There will be a blog on the vehcile, explaining some of its functionality. The Wikipedia will also be updated.
Yes, the tests were conducted on an airframe with 2/3rd of the fuel, and the take-off run was considered impractically long. It exceeds the take-off weight