Guys none of this is helping to speed up the process here. Im trying to pass the information forward to get this resolved before the aircraft gets to a later stage. So far nobody has provided anything definitive that shows AIM-9G. Right now its looking more and more likely that its AIM-9D.
Source on this please?
Sources on this please? Again, nothing credible is being presented here that I can raise to actually help the matter.
Where are the sources showing it was the 1980s and AIM-9G?
So far guys this is a lot of guess work and no definitive sources on anything here.
A pilots testimony on a modeling website is not a sufficient source im afraid.
That was for Phantom not Jaguar and as a I said, Jaguar lacks the radar to use AIM-9G. AIM-9L is not AIM-9G. We are aware of that.
Links to more recent ones please? Thats why I suggested the dev section. As previously it wasn't possible.
Is there any source to back up that its a G and not D? Since G needed a radar that Jaguar didn't have.
Best to make a separate topic
https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1981-general-discussion/
There wont be a new Type 74 variant this update, that does not exclude the future ones
Britain has 5 top tier MBTs now and should not expect more anytime soon after just getting one of the most recent/modern variants of MBTs in game.
China and France can indeed expect some in future updates.
Once again, please read what I said as you are massively misunderstanding. We have a 24 hour sever coverage for any issues so that they can be resolved around the clock and they have been.
The servers are now back up and operational already. It does not matter what time they go down, they can be resolved.
What im saying is, regarding the questions being asked about compensation and extension, they require spesific people to answer who are not awake right now as its midnight in Moscow. When they are available and we have something to share, we will.
This is not what I said. Please read again.
The issues have been resolved.
What I did say was, the sort of questions that are being asked regarding compensation are not something I have any say or control over. We have forwarded the feedback, but as of right now, its now past midnight in Moscow.
Please see my response. I am not someone that can make such decisions and I am passing all the info that I can on to you guys.
Right now its past midnight in Moscow. So there wont be any news on this until the morning.
Severs are back up for now.
Please see my response. The developers are aware of the issue but unfortunatly its not a quick fix and requires more time and attention.
Given the volatility of the servers right now, we must be extreamly careful and this is a matter that needs properly resolving.
As I said, it will be dealt with as soon as viably possible.
Server status should now be restored. We apologize for the inconvenience and will keep you updated
It means that whilst we (International Community Managers) may be awake right now to respond to you guys, most of the staff and developers at HQ are not.
We have no such control over these matters at all and are doing what we can to keep the information flowing as soon as we get it.
Severs should now be restored to fully operational status. We apologize once again and will keep you updated on the situation.
We hear them and as I said today has been an unusually high level of downtime. Occasionally we sometimes have about 30-40 mins sometimes due to issues, but today has been a real issue.
HQ are on the matter and when we have something more to share we will.
With that said, throwing hostility at those of us here trying to pass things along as soon as possible is not going to speed that up or resolve the issues better.
https://warthunder.com/en/news/6835-server-technical-difficulties-23-08-20-en
News post is up, as soon as we have more info we will post it.
Guys I fully understand the frustrations here but getting hostile is not going to solve anything.
The developers are working on the issue again and working on a solution. This is an unusually high number of server outings today and not normal at all. Everything is being done to correct it, but please consider its 23:50 Moscow time right now and HQ is hardly full of staff at this time.
Please bare in mind I am bringing you the information given to me as and when we can. I do not decide on who gets what and what can be done about things.
Insults are not helping anyone here. Please look at the time I posted that message. Things were fine at that point in time.
The aircraft is still in development and not even fully out of testing yet. I have already forwarded the point about Sidewinders, but baring in mind its Pylons and stores are non functional at the moment.
Wikpedia is not a valid source for anything like this.
If you have proper source material, please submit a report here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1904-dev-server-bug-reports/
If the bug reports have been filled for all the issues you mentioned, the please send them to me and I can raise them again.
You mean the Lynxs that technically have more weaponry than they ever fielded in reality with the Army and have things they were only tested with?
Lynx was given a very long and wide list of weaponry far beyond what it operationally had. We were extremely lenient with it.
devtrackers.gg