devtrackers.gg
Surprisingly as you said, it will come out when the update does )))
Surprisingly as you said, it will come out when the update does )))
Your about 2 weeks too late my dude.
Or we just don't sit here 24/7 when some of you guys go on a wild off topic 2 page rant. Grom already said ages ago a sub tree had nothing to do with this update.
Why we are suddenly talking about it for several pages is a mystery.
Nice try guys. No more denials today
Yes.
We don't plan to add entirely made up and fictional vehicles.
Steps are being taken to remove and replace vehicles that were not fully built where replacement options are necessary.
We do not dispute there are possibilities, and we are working to bring some of those to fruition as always. However it takes time and there is less overall than other nations in terms of viability.
Suggestions are a baseline level for a vehicle to even be considered. No suggestion topic has ever had enough information for a vehicle to be implemented from that alone. Factoring in you need all the references of measurement metrics, 3D views / drawings, details, armour / performance, internal (X-rays) and a multitude more.
If we raised the level of information required for suggestions to be enough to actually be the level required to implement something, nobody would be able to make them and it in itself would be unviable.
Regardless, this has nothing to do with this topic.
Japan has content coming this update.
Once again, making a suggestion topic is one thing. Actually having enough viable information to create a full 3D model, source all of the needed internal and external metrics, features, parameters and detail is a whole other matter.
This narrative of there being so many suggestions its irrelevant to what's actually A) Viable B) Possible.
Japan is getting two new vehicles this patch. Both unique modifications.
What on earth happened
Guys, please avoid the politics. It has nothing to do with the game, topic or anything.
Those that do not follow warnings will be issued further escalatory measures based on the forum rules.
Please keep things on track.
Does it
Your report wasn't a bug but a suggestion. Feel free to make a suggestion in the appropriate area. But it's not a Dev server bug report.
Please be sure to check the suggestions guidelines to be sure your meeting the criteria.
Oh no, you stole my comeback
No but seriously, yes we always plan to improve upon our graphics. I can't give any spesific details about our future plans with regards to invidual things, but it's an ongoing goal.
It's not really anything to do with being "too strong" at this stage.
Currently the developers have plans and some further development they want to work on regarding aviation HUDs and other features too. But the suggestion (and feedback on the matter) is well known to the developers and has been passed again recently
This really has nothing to do with this topic. Please use the naval section to discuss such matters.
Likely not no.
No I'm not a consultant. I just happen to sometimes visit museums in the UK to collect photos of vehciles for the developers to use. But it's also inlcuded non British aircraft too like the F-4J and Mystere IV as well as others.
It's possible there is still one more )
Not within this update. So its not relevant here.
That would be a fake. As evident by the fact the stat card mentions the 88mm KwK43 of the Panther II we had in game when this fake model has a 75mm.
Someone probably just made a visual mod.