Smin1080p

Hello. I did thank you.

There are no domestic French variants that can use the ATLIS II pod or self designate. All French variants worked in unison with other units that lased for them. Variants that do show signs of having an ATLIS II pod, such as photographs of Iraqi Mirage F1EQ modification, do not have any real place inside the researchable French tree. France did not use any of these variants and the variants they did use did not have the capabilities necessary to support self lasing. Such as having the required screen in the c*ckpit.

Hello. I'm back as of today.

The report in question does not really provide any new information for the developers to make any changes on. It does not show any of the values it currently has are incorrect, or provide any alternative values for the developers to change the current values too. Currently, its armour in game, like with most modern armour, is made based on the developers methods we detailed here: https://warthunder.com/en/news/7289-development-reports-concerning-the-protection-of-post-war-combat-vehicles-en

Naturally we welcome further valid sources, but as the report currently stands it A) Uses datamined information, which the developers do not accept in reports B) Provides no new values on which to make changes to the kit. Comments such as "fo...

I'm afriad I can't tell you anything as 1) I'm on holiday this week 2) the Devs already answered this in a previous Q&A and gave as much spesific info as possible.

Just to clarify there isn't any misunderstanding that the E-4 was fitted / designed for the Tomcat. Simply that at the moment the Devs have sources that state the baseline E as well as E-2 and E-4 are all possible. So for the same reasons it does not have AIM-9L just yet, the developers chose the base E model for the time being. As I said, a report would be welcomed it there is direct confirmation it could not actually carry anything other than E-4, but the current sources just confirm E-4 was designed for aircraft like the Tomcat and the E-4 was fired from it.

Considerations for later variants may be made later on.

Sources that they have also mentioned the base E model which is why it's currently been issued with that rather than later versions, for now.

As I said, reprorts are welcome with contrary information.

According to the developers, they have some documents that mention the E/E-2 which is why the E was issued to the aircraft. So far it's not been confirmed that it could in fact only have E-4 and not E/E-2 also, but if there are any documents that say such, please submit a report with them.

As we mentioned in the initial blog on custom loadouts, we are sequentially working through aircraft every major. This major was the Phantoms and MiG-21 airframes. More will be added over time.

Next week I believe.

It appears to be a visual bug depending on screen resolution. The devs are aware.

Its already been fixed in the next build.

The 9L has had an autopilot rework to address some of the reported issues from before. You should notice some positive changes in the current patch.

Should be fixed now or in the next server update.

Dev Update: We are aware of the issue and hope a fix will be in place to correct the display of the vehicle to Rank VI for console platforms tomorrow.

Have you tired relogging ?

For some reason yours is showing in Rank V, when its Rank VI for me. That may be why. If not, please contact WT support: https://support.gaijin.net/hc/en-us/categories/200005031-War-Thunder

Please submit any bugs on our dedicated reporter platform: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder

Napalm will be expanded to other nations over time. As to the spesifics of who or what aircraft, it's too early to say at this time.

Currently nothing suggests it ever made it past paper marketing material. If it was at least shown at shows like the overwing pods it would be a bit more viable. Currently though it's just a general plan.

These are illumination flares. Same thing was reported on the Harrier GR.1.

Lots of issues with the Mirage III and F.1 FMs were fixed this patch and last patch. I'm not sure what issues you are spesifcally reffering too that have not been, but sting "none of the bugs have been fixed" is just not true.

It's known and being investigated thanks. Unfortunately it's something that gets automatically triggered whenever their is a loadout change.