Its been reworked. The tank has no turret and relies entirely on its engine for movement. I'm not really sure how you are expecting to aim or move without an engine in a tank that uses it for all forms of aiming.
Its both historical and one of the main features of the tank. We have no plans to artificially buff this tank.
This is a known problem: Its autopilot needs to be re-configured. The missile first makes too much lead, then accelerates and tries to re-acquire targets with a smaller lead, which may cause a miss in some situations. The developers are investigating.
If your referring to the Pylon matter, its planned to be resolved. Just not this update.
This is not the case, the report has evidence to show they are the same.
Second* technically (the first was just extended) and its on the way. Things are not final yet.
Something being on the internet, does not make it legal. No, we will not accept any source without proof of legal declassification.
Our rules on sources are very clear:
Because they are now in BR logical order as we aim for as far as possible in all trees.
The changes were corrected to the right values, it was just an error with the notes from RU > EN:
Reload time for 4.7cm cannons on the following Italian vehicles has been revisited:
AB43 — reload time has been reduced from 4.6 to 3.3 seconds;
M13/40 (I) — reload time has been reduced from 5.0 to 4.0 seconds;
M13/40 (II) — reload time has been reduced from 5.0 to 2.9 seconds;
M13/40 (III) — reload time has been reduced from 5.0 to 2.9 seconds;
Sahariano — reload time has been reduced from 5.0 to 4.0 seconds;
47/32 L40 — reload time has been reduced from 6.0 to 3.0 seconds.
They have been corrected now:
Hi guys, any clog files and session IDs (from screenshots or server replays) would be apricated in helping review this.
Not on release. Subject to balancing reviews by the developers post launch.
There is already an Ayanami (IJN) in the Bluewater fleet thats more suited to its place. The new one is a post-war vessel more suited to Costal.
Please report any and all bugs here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/2183-dev-server-bug-reports/
Yes.
Su-17 M4 is added this update.
Profiles are generally not reset between dev servers. Unless there is a technical reason to do so.
Low tier premiums and particularly CAS support aircraft are popular. For newer players, its a solid choice.
You are absolutely not forced to buy it if you don't like it.
Im not sure what there really is to clarify. As its explained, it has different armour composition.
However several other documents and publications (including those written by those who worked on the Magic 2) directly conflict with those. Coupled with additional sources that also firmly quote 35G.
So until more conclusive evidence is found, there is not currently enough solid information to confirm 50G.
Generally we do this during economical updates. Its not planned for this major at least. With the F8s also being different ranks, it also complicates things.
Indeed. These would not be added in time anyway (unless a developer already had them in the works) and generally will be treated as suggestions. We pre-planned what bombs would be added. But they will be forwarded.
Yes for sure. Needs to be seen on the big screen.
Unless your suggesting we were going to add the F-14 in 2020, before we even had the MiG-23 or F-4J, I would recommend you rethink that.
The F-14 was always planned to come now. The fact Top Gun got delayed several times was just a coincidence that worked for us marketing wise
devtrackers.gg